UNDERSTANDING DELIBERATIVE AND INTUITIVE DECISION MAKING ABOUT HAZARDS ON CONSTRUCTION SITES

During the course of performing daily tasks, construction workers encounter numerous hazards, such as ladders that are too short to reach the work area, energized electrical lines, or inadequate fall protection. When a hazard is encountered, the worker must make a rapid decision about how to respond and whether to take or avoid the risk. The goal of this researchwas to construct a theory about the influence of decision cues on intuitive and deliberative decision-making in high-hazard construction environments. Drawing from Cognitive Continuum Theory, the study specifies a framework for understanding why and how construction workers make decisions that lead to taking or avoiding physical risks when they encounter daily hazards. A secondary aim of the research was to construct a set of hypotheses about how specific decision cues influence whether a worker is more likely to engage their intuitive impulses or to use careful deliberationwhen responding to a hazard. These hypotheses are described and the efficacy of the hypotheses was evaluated using cross-tabulations and nonparametric measures of association. While most of the associations between decision cues and decision mode (i.e., intuition or deliberation) identified in this data set were generally modest, none of the associations were statistically zero, thus indicating that further research is warranted based on theoretical grounds. The qualitative data set was analysed using Decision Trees and Recognition Primed Decision Models.A rigorous program of theory testing is the next logical step to the research, and the thesis thus concludes with numerous suggestions for extending the research and testing the proposed hypothesesM.S. in Civil Engineering, December 201