Add to ORKGMillington v. Southeastern Elevator Co., 22 N.Y.2d 498, 293 N.Y.S2d 305, 239 N.E.2d 897 (1968)
Dunham v. Village of Canisteo, 303 N. Y. 498, 104 N. E. 2d 872 (1952), rev\u27g 278 App. Div. 743, 1...
Plaintiff\u27s wife, a Caucasian, having business with a tenant on the fifteenth floor, entered defe...
The article discusses issues on spousal consortium claims and workers\u27 compensation in the U.S., ...
Where the loss of her husband\u27s consortium is the result of personal injuries caused by the mere ...
Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., 183 F. 2d 811 (1950); cert. denied, 340 U. S. 852, 71 Sup. Ct. 80 (1950)
The recent Ohio Supreme Court ruling in Clouston v. Remlinger Oldsmobile Cadillac Inc. reversed a ru...
Plaintiff sued for loss of her right of consortium occasioned by the illness and death of her husban...
Plaintiff brought an action for loss of consortium with her husband, allegedly due to defendant\u27s...
Where the legislature had not changed the common law rule that a wife could not recover for the loss...
McAllister v. New York City Housing Authority, 9 N.Y.2d 568, 216 N.Y.S.2d 77 (1961); Sobel v. City o...
When the automobile driven by plaintiff\u27s husband collided with another vehicle, plaintiff\u27s h...
Harrington v. 615 West Corp, Harrington v. 615 West Corp., 2 N.Y.2d 476, 161 N.Y.S.2d 106 (1957)
Husband and wife were residents of state A, in which a personal tort action between the spouses was ...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
Plaintiff sued defendants, including plaintiff\u27s husband, for jointly causing a false charge of a...
Dunham v. Village of Canisteo, 303 N. Y. 498, 104 N. E. 2d 872 (1952), rev\u27g 278 App. Div. 743, 1...
Plaintiff\u27s wife, a Caucasian, having business with a tenant on the fifteenth floor, entered defe...
The article discusses issues on spousal consortium claims and workers\u27 compensation in the U.S., ...
Where the loss of her husband\u27s consortium is the result of personal injuries caused by the mere ...
Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., 183 F. 2d 811 (1950); cert. denied, 340 U. S. 852, 71 Sup. Ct. 80 (1950)
The recent Ohio Supreme Court ruling in Clouston v. Remlinger Oldsmobile Cadillac Inc. reversed a ru...
Plaintiff sued for loss of her right of consortium occasioned by the illness and death of her husban...
Plaintiff brought an action for loss of consortium with her husband, allegedly due to defendant\u27s...
Where the legislature had not changed the common law rule that a wife could not recover for the loss...
McAllister v. New York City Housing Authority, 9 N.Y.2d 568, 216 N.Y.S.2d 77 (1961); Sobel v. City o...
When the automobile driven by plaintiff\u27s husband collided with another vehicle, plaintiff\u27s h...
Harrington v. 615 West Corp, Harrington v. 615 West Corp., 2 N.Y.2d 476, 161 N.Y.S.2d 106 (1957)
Husband and wife were residents of state A, in which a personal tort action between the spouses was ...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
Plaintiff sued defendants, including plaintiff\u27s husband, for jointly causing a false charge of a...
Dunham v. Village of Canisteo, 303 N. Y. 498, 104 N. E. 2d 872 (1952), rev\u27g 278 App. Div. 743, 1...
Plaintiff\u27s wife, a Caucasian, having business with a tenant on the fifteenth floor, entered defe...
The article discusses issues on spousal consortium claims and workers\u27 compensation in the U.S., ...
