The Pentagon lives in a sea of slogans, elaborate electronic graphics, and a self-satisfied belief that new platforms will solve tactical and operational problems. But slick presentations do not equate to serious military thought, and technology has rarely been more than an enabler of revolutions
Technological improvement is important but, pursued in isolation, will lead only so far. If we focus...
Established theory views military innovation as extraordinarily difficult, resulting in painful if i...
As the United States enters its tenth year at war with an amorphous yet brutal enemy, it is worth st...
The Pentagon cannot afford to “think rich,” and it cannot afford to proceed with a modernization pro...
The significance of this slim book to today’s nascent military transformation is entirely out of pro...
The U.S. armed forces themselves have embraced—at least rhetorically—the need to transform so as to ...
Over the past several years, the U.S. mil- itary has officially embraced the idea that rapidly evolv...
George Kulczycki is a U.S. Navy officer and graduate student in the Defense Analysis department at t...
The article of record as published may be found at https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2018/8/1...
Innovation is one of the four pillars of the U.S. Defense Department’s Trans- formation Plan. Innova...
Christopher Telley is a U.S. Army officer assigned to the Naval Postgraduate School.The article of r...
Torsten Gojowsky is a U.S. Army officer. Ben Haspels is a Royal Netherlands Army officer. Flemming H...
Leo Blanken is an associate professor in the Defense Analysis Department of the Naval Postgraduate S...
Includes presentation slidesThe Department of Defense and military services have all expressed grave...
The military innovation process takes on different characteristics during wartime and peacetime. War...
Technological improvement is important but, pursued in isolation, will lead only so far. If we focus...
Established theory views military innovation as extraordinarily difficult, resulting in painful if i...
As the United States enters its tenth year at war with an amorphous yet brutal enemy, it is worth st...
The Pentagon cannot afford to “think rich,” and it cannot afford to proceed with a modernization pro...
The significance of this slim book to today’s nascent military transformation is entirely out of pro...
The U.S. armed forces themselves have embraced—at least rhetorically—the need to transform so as to ...
Over the past several years, the U.S. mil- itary has officially embraced the idea that rapidly evolv...
George Kulczycki is a U.S. Navy officer and graduate student in the Defense Analysis department at t...
The article of record as published may be found at https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2018/8/1...
Innovation is one of the four pillars of the U.S. Defense Department’s Trans- formation Plan. Innova...
Christopher Telley is a U.S. Army officer assigned to the Naval Postgraduate School.The article of r...
Torsten Gojowsky is a U.S. Army officer. Ben Haspels is a Royal Netherlands Army officer. Flemming H...
Leo Blanken is an associate professor in the Defense Analysis Department of the Naval Postgraduate S...
Includes presentation slidesThe Department of Defense and military services have all expressed grave...
The military innovation process takes on different characteristics during wartime and peacetime. War...
Technological improvement is important but, pursued in isolation, will lead only so far. If we focus...
Established theory views military innovation as extraordinarily difficult, resulting in painful if i...
As the United States enters its tenth year at war with an amorphous yet brutal enemy, it is worth st...