Targeted killing is not the battlefield killing of combatants by opposing combatants or the assassination of an individual for political purposes. But in a new age of nonstate actors engaged in transnational terrorist violence, it has become a new reality, and the law of armed conflict should recognize it
The targeting of persons engages the most fundamental of all the norms in the law of war: the princi...
This article explores the restraints international human rights law and international humanitarian l...
This article seeks to highlight and discuss many of the legally problematic aspects of the US’s War ...
Defenders of targeted killings proffer a straightforward elaboration of military necessity in the co...
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">International humanitarian law (“IHL”), or the law of armed conflict ...
International humanitarian law (“IHL”), or the law of armed conflict (“LOAC”), is a branch of intern...
This paper addresses how kill-capture missions can be reconciled with the underlying principles of j...
This Article confronts one of the most difficult and contested questions in the debate about targete...
In today's asymmetric armed conflicts, military agents carry out targeted killings against civilians...
One of the most crucial and enduring questions about “targeted killings” is: How will the currently ...
One of the central controversies of the targeted killing debate is the question of who can be targ...
This paper assesses the parameters and utility of “targeted killing” in combating terrorism and its...
Though International Criminal Law evolves, its evolution needs a careful, considered and consensus a...
Literature reviewed so far shows that several scholars dismiss targeted killings as clear violation ...
In recent decades we can watch heated debates on the legal and moral permissibility of State-sponsor...
The targeting of persons engages the most fundamental of all the norms in the law of war: the princi...
This article explores the restraints international human rights law and international humanitarian l...
This article seeks to highlight and discuss many of the legally problematic aspects of the US’s War ...
Defenders of targeted killings proffer a straightforward elaboration of military necessity in the co...
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">International humanitarian law (“IHL”), or the law of armed conflict ...
International humanitarian law (“IHL”), or the law of armed conflict (“LOAC”), is a branch of intern...
This paper addresses how kill-capture missions can be reconciled with the underlying principles of j...
This Article confronts one of the most difficult and contested questions in the debate about targete...
In today's asymmetric armed conflicts, military agents carry out targeted killings against civilians...
One of the most crucial and enduring questions about “targeted killings” is: How will the currently ...
One of the central controversies of the targeted killing debate is the question of who can be targ...
This paper assesses the parameters and utility of “targeted killing” in combating terrorism and its...
Though International Criminal Law evolves, its evolution needs a careful, considered and consensus a...
Literature reviewed so far shows that several scholars dismiss targeted killings as clear violation ...
In recent decades we can watch heated debates on the legal and moral permissibility of State-sponsor...
The targeting of persons engages the most fundamental of all the norms in the law of war: the princi...
This article explores the restraints international human rights law and international humanitarian l...
This article seeks to highlight and discuss many of the legally problematic aspects of the US’s War ...