This article examines the geographical reach of international humanitarian law (law of armed conflict), particularly during armed conflicts between States and non-State organized armed groups. The issue is operationally critical, since to the extent that IHL applies, practices which are lawful during armed conflicts, such as status-based targeting, may be employed. When IHL does not apply, human rights obligations shouldered by the State govern the conduct of its military operations. The article surveys the various approaches to the the legal geography of non-international armed conflict, arguing that an interpretation by which IHL is not geographically restricted is the most supportable
Adjunct Professor Warren Small, Attorney at Law; Adjunct Professor of Law, Golden Gate University Sc...
In its mission to win the War on Terror, the United States military and CIA have been conducting t...
The geographic footprint of contemporary warfare often challenges the existing understanding of the ...
This article examines the geographical reach of international humanitarian law (law of armed conflic...
Difficulties that arise for the classification of an extraterritorial armed conflict between states ...
This article examines the use by the US of drone strikes in regions described as ‘outside areas of a...
Difficulties that arise for the classification of an extraterritorial armed conflict between states ...
As one of four commonly accepted dimensions of the scope of application of international humanitaria...
Difficulties that arise for the classification of an extraterritorial armed conflict between states ...
Extraterritorial use of force by States against suspected terrorists is no longer a new phenomenon i...
This thesis seeks to analyze whether, and how, parallel legal tools can contribute to increasing non...
This article provides a holistic examination of the international legal frameworks which regulate ta...
International humanitarian law (“IHL”), or the law of armed conflict (“LOAC”), is a branch of intern...
How do states manage disagreements about the application and interpretation of International Humanit...
Adjunct Professor Warren Small, Attorney at Law; Adjunct Professor of Law, Golden Gate University Sc...
In its mission to win the War on Terror, the United States military and CIA have been conducting t...
The geographic footprint of contemporary warfare often challenges the existing understanding of the ...
This article examines the geographical reach of international humanitarian law (law of armed conflic...
Difficulties that arise for the classification of an extraterritorial armed conflict between states ...
This article examines the use by the US of drone strikes in regions described as ‘outside areas of a...
Difficulties that arise for the classification of an extraterritorial armed conflict between states ...
As one of four commonly accepted dimensions of the scope of application of international humanitaria...
Difficulties that arise for the classification of an extraterritorial armed conflict between states ...
Extraterritorial use of force by States against suspected terrorists is no longer a new phenomenon i...
This thesis seeks to analyze whether, and how, parallel legal tools can contribute to increasing non...
This article provides a holistic examination of the international legal frameworks which regulate ta...
International humanitarian law (“IHL”), or the law of armed conflict (“LOAC”), is a branch of intern...
How do states manage disagreements about the application and interpretation of International Humanit...
Adjunct Professor Warren Small, Attorney at Law; Adjunct Professor of Law, Golden Gate University Sc...
In its mission to win the War on Terror, the United States military and CIA have been conducting t...
The geographic footprint of contemporary warfare often challenges the existing understanding of the ...