Does international law entitle armed groups to detain people? And what obligations are imposed on such non-state actors when they do detain? This article sets out suggested obligations for armed groups related to the right to challenge the basis for any detention and considers some related issues of fair trial and punishment. The last part of this article briefly considers the legal framework governing state responsibility and individual criminal responsibility for those that assist armed groups that detain people in ways that violate international law
"It is generally accepted that detention in armed conflicts is an inevitable security measure that a...
This paper examines the issue of detention of people in non-international armed conflicts. Firstly, ...
'International humanitarian law' (IHL) has long differentiated between international and non-intern...
This article discusses one principal challenge to detention without trial of suspected international...
Persons detained for reasons related to an armed conflict are in a vulnerable position. Deprived of ...
During armed conflict, non-State armed groups (NSAGs) deprive individuals of their liberty on a regu...
Detention in non-international armed conflicts (NIACs, or wars fought between States and non-State a...
While it is widely accepted that punishing the perpetrators of violations of international humanitar...
What does the law of armed conflict say about detention in non-international armed conflict? Is the ...
The question of whether international humanitarian law (IHL) provides for the power of detention to ...
International humanitarian law establishes explicit safeguards applicable to detention occurring in ...
This article proposes an alternative to the conventional way of deciding when a State may target or ...
In waging the war on terror, the United States (U.S.) has detained numerous individuals for many y...
This article explores the restraints international human rights law and international humanitarian l...
This Article touches on the choice of whether to use the language and tools of war or the language a...
"It is generally accepted that detention in armed conflicts is an inevitable security measure that a...
This paper examines the issue of detention of people in non-international armed conflicts. Firstly, ...
'International humanitarian law' (IHL) has long differentiated between international and non-intern...
This article discusses one principal challenge to detention without trial of suspected international...
Persons detained for reasons related to an armed conflict are in a vulnerable position. Deprived of ...
During armed conflict, non-State armed groups (NSAGs) deprive individuals of their liberty on a regu...
Detention in non-international armed conflicts (NIACs, or wars fought between States and non-State a...
While it is widely accepted that punishing the perpetrators of violations of international humanitar...
What does the law of armed conflict say about detention in non-international armed conflict? Is the ...
The question of whether international humanitarian law (IHL) provides for the power of detention to ...
International humanitarian law establishes explicit safeguards applicable to detention occurring in ...
This article proposes an alternative to the conventional way of deciding when a State may target or ...
In waging the war on terror, the United States (U.S.) has detained numerous individuals for many y...
This article explores the restraints international human rights law and international humanitarian l...
This Article touches on the choice of whether to use the language and tools of war or the language a...
"It is generally accepted that detention in armed conflicts is an inevitable security measure that a...
This paper examines the issue of detention of people in non-international armed conflicts. Firstly, ...
'International humanitarian law' (IHL) has long differentiated between international and non-intern...