Acclimation Effects and the Chief Justice: The Influence of Tenure and Role on the Decisional Behavior of the Court\u27s Leader, 1888-2007

Under the acclimation effect view, recent appointees to the Court modify their behavior in systematic ways early in their tenure as opposed to their later decisional tendencies. Similarly, many studies have examined the chief justice\u27s unique behavior. his study blends these two rich strands and explores whether chief justices demonstrate an acclimation effect, such that their behavior changes systematically through time. Using more than a century of Court data, this study examines whether new chief justices\u27 concurrence and dissent rates decline and whether they write fewer individual opinions gradually. I find that the chief justice\u27s position serves to create an incentive structure that is uniquely associated with declining rates of specially concurring and dissenting votes in certain cases. Also, new chief justices pen fewer special concurrences and dissents in some policy areas. My results hence imply that the chief justice experiences unique acclimation effects in learning to marshal the Court