The Codified Representation of Drawing in Territorial Systems in the Field of Urban Planning Instruments

The design crisis, specifically in the drawing of urban planning, coincided with adecisive state came out at the end of the last century, that is the crisis of place’sdrawings itself. In the past and in the present the most learned intellectuals ofthe architecture and planning shared this statement.In fact, within the institutional system there has been an ongoing loss relatedto the knowledge and understanding tout court of the drawing. The IT systemshave certainly achieved advanced levels of definition and complexity in acquiringand processing the reality datum, and they encouraged new interests whichhave proven to have overcome the ancient time, as well as his thought, made itinsignificant.In this way the frenetic need to combine a mix of participatory variability, addressedto a pluralism, has defined custom paths between hybrid forms, graphicsuperstructures of languages and indistinct modeling. Thus, it was decided toreplace the drawing with extraneous shapes, promoting the suggestions given bythe video modeling or by three-dimensional graphic.These forms of processing the great have paralyzed intuition, the knowledge ofthe space of the few that can be much deeper than the first. The need is first of allto consider drawing as thought, even in its tradition, as a geometric foundation,rather than as a code. Then the drawing, the representation, becomes again ascientific based work tool on which to order and to make linked the intelligiblerelationships in the principle of the Samonian unity of urban architectur