This article takes a radically different and unique approach to improving due process in removal/deportation proceedings. It argues that the existing adversarial system of adjudication, which is incontrovertibly inefficient, expensive and unfair, is a product of cultural imaginary. It demonstrates that if the current adversarial model is measured by contemporary utilitarian standards, it is utterly counterproductive. The article then recommends the adoption of the inquisitorial model of the civilian system by converting the majority of the 951 government lawyers, who now serve as the non-citizens’ adversaries, into administrative law judges. Through a comparative analysis of the common law and civil law systems, the article demonstrates tha...
Immigration adjudication is more diverse than it may seem. Scholars tend to focus on one aspect of a...
Judicial independence, despite its long history and cherished place in American jurisprudence, has p...
Today, jurisdiction over immigration law is by no means well defined by clear limits. Limitations on...
A thoughtful student once asked an immigration judge during an informal exchange: “If the respondent...
Prosecutorial discretion is a critical part of the administration of immigration law. This Article c...
A removal hearing in immigration court focuses on two predominant issues—whether the noncitizen is d...
For decades, the immigration adjudication system has been under relentless attack from both the left...
This article addresses the concern over the state of deportation proceedings in the United States. P...
The immigration adjudication system in the United States is in serious need of reform. While much at...
In Padilla v. Kentucky, the U.S. Supreme Court held that defense attorneys have a Sixth Amendment du...
Scholars, immigration judges, attorneys, and congressional committees have been calling for a truly ...
Should pro-immigrant advocates pursue federally funded counsel for all immigrants facing deportation...
The Immigration and Nationality Act vests enormous discretion in the Attorney General and subordinat...
This article argues that the coercive use of immigration status or “status coercion” in civil procee...
This Article examines the administrative review process with respect to bail setting by the Immigrat...
Immigration adjudication is more diverse than it may seem. Scholars tend to focus on one aspect of a...
Judicial independence, despite its long history and cherished place in American jurisprudence, has p...
Today, jurisdiction over immigration law is by no means well defined by clear limits. Limitations on...
A thoughtful student once asked an immigration judge during an informal exchange: “If the respondent...
Prosecutorial discretion is a critical part of the administration of immigration law. This Article c...
A removal hearing in immigration court focuses on two predominant issues—whether the noncitizen is d...
For decades, the immigration adjudication system has been under relentless attack from both the left...
This article addresses the concern over the state of deportation proceedings in the United States. P...
The immigration adjudication system in the United States is in serious need of reform. While much at...
In Padilla v. Kentucky, the U.S. Supreme Court held that defense attorneys have a Sixth Amendment du...
Scholars, immigration judges, attorneys, and congressional committees have been calling for a truly ...
Should pro-immigrant advocates pursue federally funded counsel for all immigrants facing deportation...
The Immigration and Nationality Act vests enormous discretion in the Attorney General and subordinat...
This article argues that the coercive use of immigration status or “status coercion” in civil procee...
This Article examines the administrative review process with respect to bail setting by the Immigrat...
Immigration adjudication is more diverse than it may seem. Scholars tend to focus on one aspect of a...
Judicial independence, despite its long history and cherished place in American jurisprudence, has p...
Today, jurisdiction over immigration law is by no means well defined by clear limits. Limitations on...