This Comment first outlines a few basic insurance concepts and distinguishes employer-provided plans from individually purchased policies. It then examines discrimination criteria and City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Power v. Manhart\u27s application of Title VII and applies those principles to Supreme Court cases. The Comment also suggests that FIPA be revised to extend its gender-neutral requirements only to employer provided group plans
The legislative intent of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act was to eradicate all forms of discr...
In Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Insurance Commissioner of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania S...
Prior to 1971 women found little relief in the courts for claims of sex discrimination. The Supreme ...
This Comment first outlines a few basic insurance concepts and distinguishes employer-provided plans...
This commentary breaks down the case of the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Man...
The European Court of Justice has held that as from 21 December 2012 insurers may no longer charge m...
Marie Manhart, a former employee of the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, brought a...
This Comment analyzes the new Title VII claim of sex-based wage discrimination, which requires a rem...
Four years have elapsed since the enactment of federal fair employment practice legislation banning ...
96 leaves. Advisor: Dwight SaundersThe problem. Public interest in the practices of the insurance...
This Comment argues that the Ninth Circuit was mistaken in concluding that Jespersen fell outside of...
Title VII prohibits discrimination whereby women or men are denied employment opportunities because ...
This Article contends that gender is an impermissible basis for calculating insurance premiums and p...
On April 25, 1978, the United States Supreme Court decided Los Angeles Department of Water and Power...
The United States Supreme Court has held that an employer cannot offer a privately run pension annui...
The legislative intent of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act was to eradicate all forms of discr...
In Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Insurance Commissioner of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania S...
Prior to 1971 women found little relief in the courts for claims of sex discrimination. The Supreme ...
This Comment first outlines a few basic insurance concepts and distinguishes employer-provided plans...
This commentary breaks down the case of the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power v. Man...
The European Court of Justice has held that as from 21 December 2012 insurers may no longer charge m...
Marie Manhart, a former employee of the City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, brought a...
This Comment analyzes the new Title VII claim of sex-based wage discrimination, which requires a rem...
Four years have elapsed since the enactment of federal fair employment practice legislation banning ...
96 leaves. Advisor: Dwight SaundersThe problem. Public interest in the practices of the insurance...
This Comment argues that the Ninth Circuit was mistaken in concluding that Jespersen fell outside of...
Title VII prohibits discrimination whereby women or men are denied employment opportunities because ...
This Article contends that gender is an impermissible basis for calculating insurance premiums and p...
On April 25, 1978, the United States Supreme Court decided Los Angeles Department of Water and Power...
The United States Supreme Court has held that an employer cannot offer a privately run pension annui...
The legislative intent of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act was to eradicate all forms of discr...
In Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Insurance Commissioner of Pennsylvania, the Pennsylvania S...
Prior to 1971 women found little relief in the courts for claims of sex discrimination. The Supreme ...