Add to ORKGThis Comment analyzes the significance of the principles animating the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination by first looking at the purposes of Washington’s Juvenile Justice Act; second, by examining the status of the privilege against self-incrimination during sentencing; and third, by applying the values protected by the privilege to the use of predisposition psychological evaluations in Washington juvenile courts
As the juvenile justice system evolves into a more punitive system, due process protections are esse...
At its inception the juvenile court was characterized by procedural informality and individualized, ...
This comment discusses the history and characteristics of traditional status offense laws, demonstra...
This Comment analyzes the significance of the principles animating the constitutional privilege agai...
State courts have struggled to balance the tensions between the juvenile justice system and a juveni...
This Comment considers the juvenile justice system and the application of the Fifth Amendment’s priv...
Youth in the justice system are at risk of self-incrimination, and the attendant consequence of pros...
In the last two decades, the juvenile justice system has focused on the early identification of yout...
The comment discusses Maryland’s Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article, §3-8A-02, along with the cas...
Article I, section 20 of the Washington Constitution states that [a]ll persons charged with crimes ...
A juvenile offender whose case has been transferred from juvenile court to criminal court may be con...
The questions of the extent of an attorney\u27s right to claim the privilege against self-incriminat...
On each and every day of the year (excluding Sundays), children are presented for an initial hearing...
Clinical evaluation of alleged juvenile delinquents regarding possible transfer to adult court must ...
(Excerpt) Part I of this Note discusses the historical background of the Fifth Amendment privilege a...
As the juvenile justice system evolves into a more punitive system, due process protections are esse...
At its inception the juvenile court was characterized by procedural informality and individualized, ...
This comment discusses the history and characteristics of traditional status offense laws, demonstra...
This Comment analyzes the significance of the principles animating the constitutional privilege agai...
State courts have struggled to balance the tensions between the juvenile justice system and a juveni...
This Comment considers the juvenile justice system and the application of the Fifth Amendment’s priv...
Youth in the justice system are at risk of self-incrimination, and the attendant consequence of pros...
In the last two decades, the juvenile justice system has focused on the early identification of yout...
The comment discusses Maryland’s Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article, §3-8A-02, along with the cas...
Article I, section 20 of the Washington Constitution states that [a]ll persons charged with crimes ...
A juvenile offender whose case has been transferred from juvenile court to criminal court may be con...
The questions of the extent of an attorney\u27s right to claim the privilege against self-incriminat...
On each and every day of the year (excluding Sundays), children are presented for an initial hearing...
Clinical evaluation of alleged juvenile delinquents regarding possible transfer to adult court must ...
(Excerpt) Part I of this Note discusses the historical background of the Fifth Amendment privilege a...
As the juvenile justice system evolves into a more punitive system, due process protections are esse...
At its inception the juvenile court was characterized by procedural informality and individualized, ...
This comment discusses the history and characteristics of traditional status offense laws, demonstra...