This Note proposes that an award of lost profits under promissory estoppel should be made only when the circumstances surrounding the making of the promise justify enforcing it as if it were a contract. Operating on the assumption that a promise is found to be a reasonable basis for reliance, this Note will propose some criteria by which a court can determine when a promise justifies a damage award in excess of the costs of reliance. These criteria will then be applied to the Farm Crop facts to demonstrate that remedies can be administered under a standard that is rational and flexible, yet provides reasonable certainty
Defendants contracted to purchase a crop of alfalfa from plaintiff, harvesting and processing to be ...
In an action recently instituted by The General Electric Co. to recover on a contract to manufacture...
This comment clarifies the considerable confusion that befogs the promissory estoppel doctrine in Wa...
This Note proposes that an award of lost profits under promissory estoppel should be made only when ...
Any comprehensive examination of recent appellate court decisions will disclose that the legal doctr...
When, in the absence of traditional contract formalities, a promise is enforced because the promisee...
Includes bibliographical references.A contract requires two or more people to come to an agreement w...
The article examines the Supreme Court decision in Guest v Guest [2022] UKSC 27 which considered the...
The Tennessee chancery courts have repeatedly been petitioned for the specific enforcement of parol ...
Plaintiff entered into an oral agreement to work defendant\u27s farm for three years with an option ...
Defendant agreed to buy part of plaintiff\u27s annual crop of hops for three years. Several months b...
Professor Hillman presents evidence that contradicts several assumptions about how courts apply the ...
Bailments - Carriers - Conversion - Trover by Bailee (A Common Carrier) Against a Third Person - On ...
In the recent case of Haugen v. Netswonger the respondent, whose sawmill was encumbered and who was ...
In 1986, Congress enacted legislation allowing solvent farm debtors to avoid income from the dischar...
Defendants contracted to purchase a crop of alfalfa from plaintiff, harvesting and processing to be ...
In an action recently instituted by The General Electric Co. to recover on a contract to manufacture...
This comment clarifies the considerable confusion that befogs the promissory estoppel doctrine in Wa...
This Note proposes that an award of lost profits under promissory estoppel should be made only when ...
Any comprehensive examination of recent appellate court decisions will disclose that the legal doctr...
When, in the absence of traditional contract formalities, a promise is enforced because the promisee...
Includes bibliographical references.A contract requires two or more people to come to an agreement w...
The article examines the Supreme Court decision in Guest v Guest [2022] UKSC 27 which considered the...
The Tennessee chancery courts have repeatedly been petitioned for the specific enforcement of parol ...
Plaintiff entered into an oral agreement to work defendant\u27s farm for three years with an option ...
Defendant agreed to buy part of plaintiff\u27s annual crop of hops for three years. Several months b...
Professor Hillman presents evidence that contradicts several assumptions about how courts apply the ...
Bailments - Carriers - Conversion - Trover by Bailee (A Common Carrier) Against a Third Person - On ...
In the recent case of Haugen v. Netswonger the respondent, whose sawmill was encumbered and who was ...
In 1986, Congress enacted legislation allowing solvent farm debtors to avoid income from the dischar...
Defendants contracted to purchase a crop of alfalfa from plaintiff, harvesting and processing to be ...
In an action recently instituted by The General Electric Co. to recover on a contract to manufacture...
This comment clarifies the considerable confusion that befogs the promissory estoppel doctrine in Wa...