Add to ORKGThe Allotment Act of 1887 diminished tribal regulatory authority over Indian reservation land use. While the Act provided for alienation of reservation land to non-Indians, it did not terminate the reservation status of alienated land. Hence, a question which repeatedly arises is whether Indians can control land use on non-Indian owned reservation land. This Note traces the historical basis of Indian regulatory authority over non-Indians, examines the Supreme Court\u27s latest decision in Brendale, and then exposes the weaknesses of that decision
Over the past three decades, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly confronted the issue of whether I...
In the summer of 2020, two significant events brought into focus the relationship between Indigenous...
Allotment of Lands in Severalty to Indians. [2812] Amendments to the act of 1887; section 4 allows f...
The Allotment Act of 1887 diminished tribal regulatory authority over Indian reservation land use. ...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s decision in Brendale v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of Yakima I...
The modern Congress and executive branch generally recognize that American Indian tribes retain thei...
This comment will examine one of the most critical aspects of the civil jurisdiction issue—tribal ju...
In order for tribal governments and individual American Indians to gain autonomy over their lands an...
Indian land claims have long been a foundational and fundamental subject of American law. Indians an...
In 1981, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Montana v. United States, severely restricting the...
The Indian Reorganization Act of 1935 is the proper avenue for Tribes pursuing restoration of their ...
Although once the owners of the North American continent, native peoples and the governments that re...
In 1978 the Supreme Court in Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe held that the retained sovereignty ...
Allotted tribal lands create troublesome questions for western water lawyers. In this article the au...
The U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in McGirt v. Oklahoma last July. The Court ruled that the ...
Over the past three decades, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly confronted the issue of whether I...
In the summer of 2020, two significant events brought into focus the relationship between Indigenous...
Allotment of Lands in Severalty to Indians. [2812] Amendments to the act of 1887; section 4 allows f...
The Allotment Act of 1887 diminished tribal regulatory authority over Indian reservation land use. ...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s decision in Brendale v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of Yakima I...
The modern Congress and executive branch generally recognize that American Indian tribes retain thei...
This comment will examine one of the most critical aspects of the civil jurisdiction issue—tribal ju...
In order for tribal governments and individual American Indians to gain autonomy over their lands an...
Indian land claims have long been a foundational and fundamental subject of American law. Indians an...
In 1981, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Montana v. United States, severely restricting the...
The Indian Reorganization Act of 1935 is the proper avenue for Tribes pursuing restoration of their ...
Although once the owners of the North American continent, native peoples and the governments that re...
In 1978 the Supreme Court in Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe held that the retained sovereignty ...
Allotted tribal lands create troublesome questions for western water lawyers. In this article the au...
The U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in McGirt v. Oklahoma last July. The Court ruled that the ...
Over the past three decades, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly confronted the issue of whether I...
In the summer of 2020, two significant events brought into focus the relationship between Indigenous...
Allotment of Lands in Severalty to Indians. [2812] Amendments to the act of 1887; section 4 allows f...