Section I summarizes the history and development of tort law in Washington, with an emphasis on the impact of the 1981 and 1986 Tort Reform Acts and their imperfect union. Section II outlines the traditional equitable remedies that are potentially available to a tortfeasor seeking reimbursement for having paid more than its share. Section III sets out the thesis and explains why under current law a tortfeasor\u27s suit for reimbursement should be the exception, not the rule. The need, and the basis, for such litigation is dependent upon the existence of joint and several liability-which now occurs only infrequently
This Article advocates that states\u27 statutes make greater and more systematic use of multiple dam...
In Royal Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., the Nebraska Supreme Court was presented with...
This Article defends RCW 4.22.070 and opposes the deconstruction of legislative tort reform. The Ar...
Contribution is the right of a tort-feasor who has paid an injured plaintiff to obtain partial reimb...
In this discussion of the 1986 rejection and modification of the joint and several liability rule, a...
With the Washington Supreme Court having recently invalidated the statutory cap placed on awards of ...
This Note explores the Tegman decision in the context of joint and several liability between neglige...
Since their development by the English court in Indermaur v. Dames, the categories of trespasser, li...
Washington\u27s Industrial Insurance Act immunizes employers from tort actions brought by their inju...
Dramatically altering the concept of sovereign responsibility in the field of injuries to person and...
This Article first reviews what a study of the 1986 Tort Reform Act reveals to be problems created b...
Covers cases on contributory negligence as not a defense to wanton misconduct, on res ipsa loquitur ...
This note argues that the correct resolution of the tension between the employer’s immunity and the ...
Plaintiffs were injured in a collision involving vehicles driven by the individual defendants Hershb...
The Washington Legislature in its 1981 session enacted Senate bill 3158,1 the Tort and Product Liabi...
This Article advocates that states\u27 statutes make greater and more systematic use of multiple dam...
In Royal Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., the Nebraska Supreme Court was presented with...
This Article defends RCW 4.22.070 and opposes the deconstruction of legislative tort reform. The Ar...
Contribution is the right of a tort-feasor who has paid an injured plaintiff to obtain partial reimb...
In this discussion of the 1986 rejection and modification of the joint and several liability rule, a...
With the Washington Supreme Court having recently invalidated the statutory cap placed on awards of ...
This Note explores the Tegman decision in the context of joint and several liability between neglige...
Since their development by the English court in Indermaur v. Dames, the categories of trespasser, li...
Washington\u27s Industrial Insurance Act immunizes employers from tort actions brought by their inju...
Dramatically altering the concept of sovereign responsibility in the field of injuries to person and...
This Article first reviews what a study of the 1986 Tort Reform Act reveals to be problems created b...
Covers cases on contributory negligence as not a defense to wanton misconduct, on res ipsa loquitur ...
This note argues that the correct resolution of the tension between the employer’s immunity and the ...
Plaintiffs were injured in a collision involving vehicles driven by the individual defendants Hershb...
The Washington Legislature in its 1981 session enacted Senate bill 3158,1 the Tort and Product Liabi...
This Article advocates that states\u27 statutes make greater and more systematic use of multiple dam...
In Royal Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., the Nebraska Supreme Court was presented with...
This Article defends RCW 4.22.070 and opposes the deconstruction of legislative tort reform. The Ar...