This Comment argues that the Washington State legislature took an important step along the road to permanency for abused and neglected children in the state\u27s care when it revised its Juvenile Court Act in 2003. This Act created the presumption that dependency proceedings are open to the public unless a judge determines that excluding the public is in the best interest of the child. This change in Washington state law represents one piece of the puzzle of reforms necessary to reach permanency goals for children in our child welfare system. Those states whose juvenile dependency hearings remainclosed should now consider following in Washington\u27s footsteps. Part II provides an overview of the types of dependency hearings covered by the ...
Simply stated, the purpose of child support is to provide necessary elements of support to those typ...
State courts have struggled to balance the tensions between the juvenile justice system and a juveni...
Article I, section 20 of the Washington Constitution states that [a]ll persons charged with crimes ...
This Comment argues that the Washington State legislature took an important step along the road to p...
State agencies initiate dependency proceedings when a child is alleged, often due to parental neglec...
The federal Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 recognized that in certain egregious circumstance...
This comment discusses the history and characteristics of traditional status offense laws, demonstra...
Prior to 1978, Washington allowed trial judges broad discretion to decide, on a case by case basis, ...
In a recent decision, Horne v. Flores, the Court demanded a broader and more flexible application of...
This Comment gives a practical overview of the Becca Bill and its provisions and addresses the poten...
From 2006 to 2016, 32,000 incarcerated parents in the United States permanently lost their parental ...
This Comment argues that the juvenile justice system should be retained in theory, but that Washingt...
A small child enters a courtroom to face the people that have subjected her to sexual and physical a...
The Becca Bill, enacted in Washington State in 1995, changed the way Washington treats runaway juven...
Part I of this Comment surveys the various theories of the role of the guardian ad litem in child ab...
Simply stated, the purpose of child support is to provide necessary elements of support to those typ...
State courts have struggled to balance the tensions between the juvenile justice system and a juveni...
Article I, section 20 of the Washington Constitution states that [a]ll persons charged with crimes ...
This Comment argues that the Washington State legislature took an important step along the road to p...
State agencies initiate dependency proceedings when a child is alleged, often due to parental neglec...
The federal Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 recognized that in certain egregious circumstance...
This comment discusses the history and characteristics of traditional status offense laws, demonstra...
Prior to 1978, Washington allowed trial judges broad discretion to decide, on a case by case basis, ...
In a recent decision, Horne v. Flores, the Court demanded a broader and more flexible application of...
This Comment gives a practical overview of the Becca Bill and its provisions and addresses the poten...
From 2006 to 2016, 32,000 incarcerated parents in the United States permanently lost their parental ...
This Comment argues that the juvenile justice system should be retained in theory, but that Washingt...
A small child enters a courtroom to face the people that have subjected her to sexual and physical a...
The Becca Bill, enacted in Washington State in 1995, changed the way Washington treats runaway juven...
Part I of this Comment surveys the various theories of the role of the guardian ad litem in child ab...
Simply stated, the purpose of child support is to provide necessary elements of support to those typ...
State courts have struggled to balance the tensions between the juvenile justice system and a juveni...
Article I, section 20 of the Washington Constitution states that [a]ll persons charged with crimes ...