Although the federal government claims otherwise, Race to the Top is not research based. Rather, its foundation is in ideology and belief-based realism. The overall effort is fundamentally antiscientific and distracts valuable and needed attention, resources, and focus from the nation\u27s real problems of social, economic, and educational deprivation
In this chapter a discussion of a salient dimension of the external environment in which today’s edu...
The current era of standards and accountability in U.S. public schooling narrows recognition and ass...
Published online: 17 August 2022Educational institutions are imbued with an institutional meritocrat...
This paper explores the tensions that exist between the espoused purpose of Race to the Top educatio...
The purpose of this study is to trace federal involvement in public K-12 education policy and to det...
Eli Broad’s approach to reforming urban public education does not recognize his own self-interest in...
In this analysis, I examine the relationship between neoliberalism and public education in order to ...
The contributors to this special issue of The Journal of Inquiry and Action provide insight into why...
Outlines expected requirements for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act's funding to the state...
In this paper, we argue that national education policy has maintained educational inequality through...
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was first passed in 1965 and has since been reauth...
The growth of the federal government’s role in public education was evidenced in the Race to the Top...
Amidst the transition from No Child Left Behind (NCLB) to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), th...
Thinking back to his time as a middle school teacher, Marlon Cummings, Governors State University Pr...
An essay is presented on a critical review of federal education policy of the U.S. which focuses on ...
In this chapter a discussion of a salient dimension of the external environment in which today’s edu...
The current era of standards and accountability in U.S. public schooling narrows recognition and ass...
Published online: 17 August 2022Educational institutions are imbued with an institutional meritocrat...
This paper explores the tensions that exist between the espoused purpose of Race to the Top educatio...
The purpose of this study is to trace federal involvement in public K-12 education policy and to det...
Eli Broad’s approach to reforming urban public education does not recognize his own self-interest in...
In this analysis, I examine the relationship between neoliberalism and public education in order to ...
The contributors to this special issue of The Journal of Inquiry and Action provide insight into why...
Outlines expected requirements for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act's funding to the state...
In this paper, we argue that national education policy has maintained educational inequality through...
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was first passed in 1965 and has since been reauth...
The growth of the federal government’s role in public education was evidenced in the Race to the Top...
Amidst the transition from No Child Left Behind (NCLB) to the Common Core State Standards (CCSS), th...
Thinking back to his time as a middle school teacher, Marlon Cummings, Governors State University Pr...
An essay is presented on a critical review of federal education policy of the U.S. which focuses on ...
In this chapter a discussion of a salient dimension of the external environment in which today’s edu...
The current era of standards and accountability in U.S. public schooling narrows recognition and ass...
Published online: 17 August 2022Educational institutions are imbued with an institutional meritocrat...