O Estado e o processo de globalização

What is the role of the State In the globalized world In which we live? Economical growth and political stability willl continue to be compatible? Which are the basic differences In social economic politics between the Keyneslan-Fordist and the Neo-liberal States? The sovereignty of the Nation- States will be restored in time to prevent the chaos to which globalization is carrying the world to? The search for the answers to these and other questions equally relevant constitute the intention of this paper. Mr. Jacques Fontanel analyzes dominant Capitalism in the three most representative versions (American, German and Chinese), whose divergences tend to disappear by the declining participation of the State, by the internationalization of the world economy and by the space occupied by the private companies. Against the followers of the market as a "panacea against all the social political problems", the author asks how does one explain, then, the occurrence of crises dominant market. Besides this, he States that one lives, today, in the era of new Fundamentalism, based in the virtues of the market. The text focus the State as an instance of regulation of the market and trust control. !n one economy with monopolized and/or oligopolized sectors, it is necessary a regulation that provides taxation incentives, according to the author. For M. Fontanel, the State is the uncertainty reducer agent in relation to the markets, while establishing new rules in international negotiation, inspiring confidence or not to investors. He analyzes the existing models of relation between the State and the market, describing the "laissez-faire", the model of Social Democracy, the German model and the French, Japanese and Soviet models. Following, the author observes the economical relations which surpass systematically the frontiers of the Nation State, reducing the potential of macro-economical regulation, being limited by the Internationalization and the capacity of society in civilize its economy. It appears, then, as a phenomenon of central worldwide internationalization, the dissociation of the spaces among companies and the spaces of political regulations.What is the role of the State In the globalized world In which we live? Economical growth and political stability willl continue to be compatible? Which are the basic differences In social economic politics between the Keyneslan-Fordist and the Neo-liberal States? The sovereignty of the Nation- States will be restored in time to prevent the chaos to which globalization is carrying the world to? The search for the answers to these and other questions equally relevant constitute the intention of this paper. Mr. Jacques Fontanel analyzes dominant Capitalism in the three most representative versions (American, German and Chinese), whose divergences tend to disappear by the declining participation of the State, by the internationalization of the world economy and by the space occupied by the private companies. Against the followers of the market as a "panacea against all the social political problems", the author asks how does one explain, then, the occurrence of crises dominant market. Besides this, he States that one lives, today, in the era of new Fundamentalism, based in the virtues of the market. The text focus the State as an instance of regulation of the market and trust control. !n one economy with monopolized and/or oligopolized sectors, it is necessary a regulation that provides taxation incentives, according to the author. For M. Fontanel, the State is the uncertainty reducer agent in relation to the markets, while establishing new rules in international negotiation, inspiring confidence or not to investors. He analyzes the existing models of relation between the State and the market, describing the "laissez-faire", the model of Social Democracy, the German model and the French, Japanese and Soviet models. Following, the author observes the economical relations which surpass systematically the frontiers of the Nation State, reducing the potential of macro-economical regulation, being limited by the Internationalization and the capacity of society in civilize its economy. It appears, then, as a phenomenon of central worldwide internationalization, the dissociation of the spaces among companies and the spaces of political regulations