Add to ORKGPeer review is a necessary process with a long history of complaints, including over-solicitation of a small number of reviewers, delays, inadequate numbers of reviewers, and a lack of incentives to provide strong reviews or avoid reviews with little helpful information for the author. In the era of Web-based distribution of research, through working paper or project reports, anonymous peer reviews are much less likely. The Journal of Ocean and Coastal Economics will use signed peer reviews and an open communication process among authors, reviewers, and editors. This approach, to be developed over time, should lead to stronger communication of research results for the Journal\u27s readers. Lea el abstracto en españo
Scholars are increasingly declining to offer their services in the peer review process. There are my...
Peer-reviewing holds significant importance in the process of scientific publishing. The process of ...
Since 2005, and with generous support from the A.W. Mellon Foundation, The Future of Scholarly Commu...
Ever-increasing numbers of manuscripts, grant proposals, working group documents, position papers, e...
Peer review is the defining feature of scholarly communication. In a 2018 survey of more than 11,000...
The peer-review system ensures the reliability of academic publication. However, authors may be unsa...
This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic...
© 2018, Grupo de Investigacion en Atencion Farmaceutica. All rights reserved. The peer-review crisis...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
It is a time of great innovation in peer review. Traditional models are being adapted and completely...
Peer review is an essential part of academic publishing, yet many authors, reviewers, and editors ha...
Today’s academic publishing system may be problematic, but many argue it is the only one available t...
This report recommends creating a wider array of institutionally acceptable and cost-effective alter...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
Over the last several months, as I\u27ve met with the folks from if:book and with the quite impressi...
Scholars are increasingly declining to offer their services in the peer review process. There are my...
Peer-reviewing holds significant importance in the process of scientific publishing. The process of ...
Since 2005, and with generous support from the A.W. Mellon Foundation, The Future of Scholarly Commu...
Ever-increasing numbers of manuscripts, grant proposals, working group documents, position papers, e...
Peer review is the defining feature of scholarly communication. In a 2018 survey of more than 11,000...
The peer-review system ensures the reliability of academic publication. However, authors may be unsa...
This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic...
© 2018, Grupo de Investigacion en Atencion Farmaceutica. All rights reserved. The peer-review crisis...
Editors and publishers of scholarly journals rarely agree on what makes for a good publication; they...
It is a time of great innovation in peer review. Traditional models are being adapted and completely...
Peer review is an essential part of academic publishing, yet many authors, reviewers, and editors ha...
Today’s academic publishing system may be problematic, but many argue it is the only one available t...
This report recommends creating a wider array of institutionally acceptable and cost-effective alter...
In academia, peer review functions as a quality-assurance mechanism which also aims to improve the s...
Over the last several months, as I\u27ve met with the folks from if:book and with the quite impressi...
Scholars are increasingly declining to offer their services in the peer review process. There are my...
Peer-reviewing holds significant importance in the process of scientific publishing. The process of ...
Since 2005, and with generous support from the A.W. Mellon Foundation, The Future of Scholarly Commu...