The purpose of this article is to raise awareness of the authority of federal courts to certify questions to the Arkansas Supreme Court and of some of the undeveloped legal issues surrounding the rule itself. The certification process, allowed under Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 6-8, is neither simple nor inexpensive, but it will most likely be less complicated and expensive than other alternatives available to a federal court and litigants involved in federal court litigation when a question of unclear Arkansas state law presents itself. Certification is treated as an appeal. Therefore, fees and costs are the same as in any other civil appeal docketed before the Arkansas Supreme Court and are equally divided between the parties unless otherw...
This article seeks to clear up the confusion over substantial federal questions. Part I provides a...
In the First Amendment-based speech cases of both Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky in 2018 and Ex...
An update to the 2007 State-by-State Report on Authentication of Online Legal Resources
The purpose of this article is to raise awareness of the authority of federal courts to certify ques...
For some time, federal courts faced with unresolved questions of state law have been able to certify...
For 30 years, federal courts have certified questions of state law to the Utah Supreme Court. This t...
In examining the history and intent behind the enactment of the Florida interjurisdictional certific...
When an unresolved state-law question arises in federal court, the court may certify it to the relev...
This article summarizes the legislative process in Arkansas. It lists and provides descriptions of A...
This note examines the history of judicial federalism by discussing the history of its use, as well ...
Jurisdiction of the U.S. Court in Western Arkansas. 12 July. HD 83, 55-1, vl, 2p. [3571] Jurisdictio...
The framers of the constitution certainly knew that instances of hardship would result from the proh...
In 2009, Arkansas ended publication of the Arkansas Reports. Since 1837 this series of volumes, join...
In 1995, the American Judicature Society (AJS) undertook a comprehensive survey of certification. Th...
This Essay first argues that Arkansas has yet to conclusively articulate when a prosecutorial suppre...
This article seeks to clear up the confusion over substantial federal questions. Part I provides a...
In the First Amendment-based speech cases of both Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky in 2018 and Ex...
An update to the 2007 State-by-State Report on Authentication of Online Legal Resources
The purpose of this article is to raise awareness of the authority of federal courts to certify ques...
For some time, federal courts faced with unresolved questions of state law have been able to certify...
For 30 years, federal courts have certified questions of state law to the Utah Supreme Court. This t...
In examining the history and intent behind the enactment of the Florida interjurisdictional certific...
When an unresolved state-law question arises in federal court, the court may certify it to the relev...
This article summarizes the legislative process in Arkansas. It lists and provides descriptions of A...
This note examines the history of judicial federalism by discussing the history of its use, as well ...
Jurisdiction of the U.S. Court in Western Arkansas. 12 July. HD 83, 55-1, vl, 2p. [3571] Jurisdictio...
The framers of the constitution certainly knew that instances of hardship would result from the proh...
In 2009, Arkansas ended publication of the Arkansas Reports. Since 1837 this series of volumes, join...
In 1995, the American Judicature Society (AJS) undertook a comprehensive survey of certification. Th...
This Essay first argues that Arkansas has yet to conclusively articulate when a prosecutorial suppre...
This article seeks to clear up the confusion over substantial federal questions. Part I provides a...
In the First Amendment-based speech cases of both Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky in 2018 and Ex...
An update to the 2007 State-by-State Report on Authentication of Online Legal Resources