The divided panel decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in /n re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 466 (1998), represented a dramatic shift in that court\u27s thinking on the question whether the attorney-client privilege protects what a government official says to his agency\u27s counsel in confidence. Although the court of appeals in at least four previous decisions had held that a government agency client holds the same privilege any other client would under like circumstances to communicate with counsel in private, the Lindsey court took a quite different view
This Note examines the interests that must be balanced in determining when an attorney\u27s disclosu...
In 1981, the U.S. Supreme Court in Upjohn Co. u United States clarified the application of the atto...
The purpose for attorney-client privilege is to encourage open communications between the attorney a...
The divided panel decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in /n re Lindsey, 158 F...
The long recognized common-law privilege afforded to certain conversations between attorneys and the...
The attorney-client privilege is the oldest evidentiary privilege known to the common law. It exist...
The long recognized common-law privilege afforded to certain conversations between attorneys and the...
After sixty-six years of struggle and controversy surrounding the application of the attorney-client...
The long recognized common-law privilege afforded to certain conversations between attorneys and the...
A recent case from the Federal District Court for Nevada, In re Bull, raises some interesting proble...
This Note examines the interests that must be balanced in determining when an attorney\u27s disclosu...
Part I of this Note examines two of the more popular standards, the Seventh Circuit\u27s subject ma...
A recent case from the Federal District Court for Nevada, In re Bull, raises some interesting proble...
Part I of this Note examines two of the more popular standards, the Seventh Circuit\u27s subject ma...
This Court should grant review not only because this is a case of national importance and prominence...
This Note examines the interests that must be balanced in determining when an attorney\u27s disclosu...
In 1981, the U.S. Supreme Court in Upjohn Co. u United States clarified the application of the atto...
The purpose for attorney-client privilege is to encourage open communications between the attorney a...
The divided panel decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in /n re Lindsey, 158 F...
The long recognized common-law privilege afforded to certain conversations between attorneys and the...
The attorney-client privilege is the oldest evidentiary privilege known to the common law. It exist...
The long recognized common-law privilege afforded to certain conversations between attorneys and the...
After sixty-six years of struggle and controversy surrounding the application of the attorney-client...
The long recognized common-law privilege afforded to certain conversations between attorneys and the...
A recent case from the Federal District Court for Nevada, In re Bull, raises some interesting proble...
This Note examines the interests that must be balanced in determining when an attorney\u27s disclosu...
Part I of this Note examines two of the more popular standards, the Seventh Circuit\u27s subject ma...
A recent case from the Federal District Court for Nevada, In re Bull, raises some interesting proble...
Part I of this Note examines two of the more popular standards, the Seventh Circuit\u27s subject ma...
This Court should grant review not only because this is a case of national importance and prominence...
This Note examines the interests that must be balanced in determining when an attorney\u27s disclosu...
In 1981, the U.S. Supreme Court in Upjohn Co. u United States clarified the application of the atto...
The purpose for attorney-client privilege is to encourage open communications between the attorney a...