E. E. Cummings is a poet who has been neglected by critics in the presence of such men as T.S. Eliot, William Carlos Williams, Wallace Stevens and Ezra Pound. But the variety, creativity, ardent experimentalism and striking lyricism of Cummings\u27 work demand the reader\u27s attention. His unusual habits of typography, word order and grammatical usage have driven critics away with elicited responses which label his work vague, transparent, and impenetrably personal. The purpose of this paper is to disprove these claims by explaining certain aspects of Cummings\u27 experimentalism. I will discuss first several of his typographical and descriptive idiosyncrasies. Next I will focus on a single device, given the name metonymy by Robert E. Ma...