The article challenges the U.S. to reevaluate the fundamental right to vote against racial targeting and urges the U.S. Supreme Court to reject the belief that race should be justified as a factor in legislative gerrymandering because it is too sensitive a factor to be considered when gerrymandering
Part I of this Article reviews the congressional redistricting process in Georgia, particularly the ...
[Excerpt] “For the most part, the Constitution speaks in generalities. The 14th Amendment, for examp...
Lawyers in voting discrimination cases are fond of quoting Justice Frankfurter\u27s dictum that the...
This article is based on one that was first published in The Wastington Post on April 16, 1995. It ...
Losers in partisan districting battles have long challenged the resulting districting plans under se...
The Reconstruction Amendments\u27 guarantee of civil rights and political equality for racial minori...
The Supreme Court, having found that certain states received unequal treatment under the Voting Righ...
This Article proceeds along two lines. First, it reviews the theories of harm set forth in the Justi...
As illustrated by its 2019 decision in Rucho v. Common Cause, the Supreme Court has gerrymandered it...
There are two ways to read the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County Alabama v. Holder: as a min...
This Note traces the history of the voter suppression in the United States, connecting present-day e...
The problem with creating and enforcing redistricting standards arises poignantly in racial gerryman...
This Article examines issues of inequality in education, minority representation, and access to the ...
Like history, the racial gerrymandering cause of action has repeated itself, the first time as trage...
Since its founding, the United States has counted democratic elections as a fundamental tenet of dem...
Part I of this Article reviews the congressional redistricting process in Georgia, particularly the ...
[Excerpt] “For the most part, the Constitution speaks in generalities. The 14th Amendment, for examp...
Lawyers in voting discrimination cases are fond of quoting Justice Frankfurter\u27s dictum that the...
This article is based on one that was first published in The Wastington Post on April 16, 1995. It ...
Losers in partisan districting battles have long challenged the resulting districting plans under se...
The Reconstruction Amendments\u27 guarantee of civil rights and political equality for racial minori...
The Supreme Court, having found that certain states received unequal treatment under the Voting Righ...
This Article proceeds along two lines. First, it reviews the theories of harm set forth in the Justi...
As illustrated by its 2019 decision in Rucho v. Common Cause, the Supreme Court has gerrymandered it...
There are two ways to read the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County Alabama v. Holder: as a min...
This Note traces the history of the voter suppression in the United States, connecting present-day e...
The problem with creating and enforcing redistricting standards arises poignantly in racial gerryman...
This Article examines issues of inequality in education, minority representation, and access to the ...
Like history, the racial gerrymandering cause of action has repeated itself, the first time as trage...
Since its founding, the United States has counted democratic elections as a fundamental tenet of dem...
Part I of this Article reviews the congressional redistricting process in Georgia, particularly the ...
[Excerpt] “For the most part, the Constitution speaks in generalities. The 14th Amendment, for examp...
Lawyers in voting discrimination cases are fond of quoting Justice Frankfurter\u27s dictum that the...