Add to ORKGThe article examines the history of cell site location information (CSLI) technology and the relevant federal statutes. Topics discussed include mechanics and content of CSLI data; advances in CSLI technology and the importance of this information to law enforcement; and need of Louisiana legislature be proactive in adopting a comprehensive CSLI
In a significant ruling in the fall of 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the governm...
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seiz...
With the help of technological advancements, law enforcement can now hijack a targeted individual’s ...
The past fifty years has witnessed an evolution in technology advancement in police surveillance. To...
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court found that a warrant was required to obtain histori...
The warrantless acquisition of cell site location information (CSLI) by law enforcement implicates s...
Only a small fraction of law enforcement agencies in the United States obtain a warrant before track...
Courts are divided as to whether law enforcement can collect cell phone location information in real...
In 2012, federal juries convicted two men of armed robbery based in part on historical cell site loc...
Cell phones are a way of life in our society. While most people readily use their cell phones, they ...
The ubiquity of cell phones has transformed police investigations. Tracking a suspect\u27s movements...
This comment explores how broader shifts in Fourth Amendment doctrine may affect the government\u27s...
Police surveillance ability and information gathering capacity have a dynamic relationship with tech...
The authors examine the unique legal and privacy implications that cell site location information tr...
The Fourth Amendment, which affords individuals protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, ...
In a significant ruling in the fall of 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the governm...
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seiz...
With the help of technological advancements, law enforcement can now hijack a targeted individual’s ...
The past fifty years has witnessed an evolution in technology advancement in police surveillance. To...
In Carpenter v. United States, the Supreme Court found that a warrant was required to obtain histori...
The warrantless acquisition of cell site location information (CSLI) by law enforcement implicates s...
Only a small fraction of law enforcement agencies in the United States obtain a warrant before track...
Courts are divided as to whether law enforcement can collect cell phone location information in real...
In 2012, federal juries convicted two men of armed robbery based in part on historical cell site loc...
Cell phones are a way of life in our society. While most people readily use their cell phones, they ...
The ubiquity of cell phones has transformed police investigations. Tracking a suspect\u27s movements...
This comment explores how broader shifts in Fourth Amendment doctrine may affect the government\u27s...
Police surveillance ability and information gathering capacity have a dynamic relationship with tech...
The authors examine the unique legal and privacy implications that cell site location information tr...
The Fourth Amendment, which affords individuals protection from unreasonable searches and seizures, ...
In a significant ruling in the fall of 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the governm...
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seiz...
With the help of technological advancements, law enforcement can now hijack a targeted individual’s ...