Add to ORKGThe article discusses the Delaware Supreme Court\u27s decision in the case \u27Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc.\u27 in which the court sale of corporate control, the target\u27s board of directors has a duty to maximize stockholder value. Topics discussed include relationship between the deal protection devices and sale process; golden ratio of corporate deal-making; and the court\u27s definition of an ideal merger and acquisition of a sale process
This article analyzes the ramifications of the Delaware Supreme Court\u27s decision in Glassman v. U...
The author analyzes the role of corporate boards of directors during takeover and control transactio...
Merger mania currently grips the United States as corporations scramble to find merger partners to a...
In light of recent developments in auction theory, this Article re-examines Delaware corporate law g...
This Article examines three separate aspects of the relationships between corporations and their sec...
This is the first scholarly article to explore the recent prevalence of go-shop provisions in merger...
Part I of this article examines the historical evolution of antitrust laws, specifically as they hav...
Deal protection devices are contractual terms in a merger agreement. They motivate parties to consum...
A fundamental issue in Delaware mergers & acquisitions (M&A) law is the extent to which a target com...
In mergers and acquisitions transactions, a buyer and a seller will often agree to contractual mecha...
The ability to protect mergers is important to both targets and acquirors. A series of recent Chanc...
Taking your company private has never been so appealing. The collapse of the tech bubble has left ma...
This article examines the evolution of Delaware appraisal litigation and concludes that recent prece...
This Article argues that the going concern value standard adopted by the Delaware courts as the me...
From the classic Cary-Winter debate to current legal scholarship, commentators have struggled to exp...
This article analyzes the ramifications of the Delaware Supreme Court\u27s decision in Glassman v. U...
The author analyzes the role of corporate boards of directors during takeover and control transactio...
Merger mania currently grips the United States as corporations scramble to find merger partners to a...
In light of recent developments in auction theory, this Article re-examines Delaware corporate law g...
This Article examines three separate aspects of the relationships between corporations and their sec...
This is the first scholarly article to explore the recent prevalence of go-shop provisions in merger...
Part I of this article examines the historical evolution of antitrust laws, specifically as they hav...
Deal protection devices are contractual terms in a merger agreement. They motivate parties to consum...
A fundamental issue in Delaware mergers & acquisitions (M&A) law is the extent to which a target com...
In mergers and acquisitions transactions, a buyer and a seller will often agree to contractual mecha...
The ability to protect mergers is important to both targets and acquirors. A series of recent Chanc...
Taking your company private has never been so appealing. The collapse of the tech bubble has left ma...
This article examines the evolution of Delaware appraisal litigation and concludes that recent prece...
This Article argues that the going concern value standard adopted by the Delaware courts as the me...
From the classic Cary-Winter debate to current legal scholarship, commentators have struggled to exp...
This article analyzes the ramifications of the Delaware Supreme Court\u27s decision in Glassman v. U...
The author analyzes the role of corporate boards of directors during takeover and control transactio...
Merger mania currently grips the United States as corporations scramble to find merger partners to a...