With the passing of juvenile crime policies by legislators to help protect society from the juvenile super-predator, the key question that must be raised is, has it made a difference? Juvenile crime policies have a great deal of impact on more than just the juvenile committing the crime. Understanding criminal court jurisdiction for juveniles helps illuminate the impact these policies have on the juveniles and communities in terms of who really suffers the punishment
Across the nation, serious and chronic juvenile offenders are increasingly being tried as adults in ...
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of juvenile status on sentencing in the adult cri...
Properly understood, “juvenile justice” encompasses all four primary categories of juvenile court ju...
The selection of jurisdiction for adjudicating juvenile crime today is one of the most controversial...
An inability to reconcile society\u27s need for protection from juvenile crime with the use of nonpu...
Within the past decade, nearly every state has amended its juvenile code in response to perceived in...
Since the 1960s, recurring cycles of political activism over youth crime have motivated efforts to r...
Juvenile courts—special courts having jurisdiction over juvenile offenders—were created which profes...
Rising juvenile crime rates over three decades spurred legal mobilizations within many state legisla...
Changes in juvenile law and juvenile court procedure are slowly dis-mantling the jurisdictional bord...
In the past two decades, nearly every state has expanded its authority and simplified its procedures...
Since 1990, nearly every state has enacted new laws to expand the transfer adolescent offenders from...
This chapter discusses the research on the general and specific deterrent effects of transferring ju...
juvenile court systems across the United States, the philosophy of juvenile justice has reflected so...
Juvenile justice systems throughout the United States have become increasingly punitive since the 19...
Across the nation, serious and chronic juvenile offenders are increasingly being tried as adults in ...
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of juvenile status on sentencing in the adult cri...
Properly understood, “juvenile justice” encompasses all four primary categories of juvenile court ju...
The selection of jurisdiction for adjudicating juvenile crime today is one of the most controversial...
An inability to reconcile society\u27s need for protection from juvenile crime with the use of nonpu...
Within the past decade, nearly every state has amended its juvenile code in response to perceived in...
Since the 1960s, recurring cycles of political activism over youth crime have motivated efforts to r...
Juvenile courts—special courts having jurisdiction over juvenile offenders—were created which profes...
Rising juvenile crime rates over three decades spurred legal mobilizations within many state legisla...
Changes in juvenile law and juvenile court procedure are slowly dis-mantling the jurisdictional bord...
In the past two decades, nearly every state has expanded its authority and simplified its procedures...
Since 1990, nearly every state has enacted new laws to expand the transfer adolescent offenders from...
This chapter discusses the research on the general and specific deterrent effects of transferring ju...
juvenile court systems across the United States, the philosophy of juvenile justice has reflected so...
Juvenile justice systems throughout the United States have become increasingly punitive since the 19...
Across the nation, serious and chronic juvenile offenders are increasingly being tried as adults in ...
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of juvenile status on sentencing in the adult cri...
Properly understood, “juvenile justice” encompasses all four primary categories of juvenile court ju...