Analisis Terhadap Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Oleh PT Wahana Ottomitra Multiartha, TBK. Cabang Pekanbaru Terhadap Pekerja Atas Penolakan Mutasi (Studi Kasus Terhadap Putusan Nomor: 95/PDT.SUS-PHI/2017/PN.PBR)

Industrial relations is a system of relationships that consists of elements of employers, workers, and the government. Industrial relations do not always go smoothly, sometimes disputes arise between employers and workers. As happened in Case Number: 95 / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2017 / PN.Pbr with the principal disputes on termination of employment unilaterally. In the case, the Defendant did the transfer of the workplace and the transfer of position to the Plaintiff improperly and ended with the termination of employment with the Plaintiff. The process of terminating employment done by the Defendant also contradicts the prevailing laws and regulations. Based on the things mentioned above, the writer are interested in conducting this research. The main problem that the writer formulated in this research is how the position of the case in Case Number: 95 / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2017 / PN.Pbr and how the legal of the judge considerations in Decision Number: 95 / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2017 / PN. Pbr. The research method used is a normative legal research method, namely legal research using secondary data only. In addition, this research is descriptive. Descriptive studies are intended to provide data as accurately as possible. Drawing conclusions in this study is done in a deductive way, namely to draw conclusions from general things to specific things. The mutations ordered by the Defendant to the Plaintiff are very unnatural and appropriate. In addition to being transferred to the workplace, the Plaintiff was also transferred from his previous position, namely as the Asset Management Unit (AMU) Supervisor of the Warehouse Head of his new position as the Branch Credit Marketing Head (my motorcycle). Both positions have the same grade with different work orientation. However, the Plaintiff was not given job training in advance to occupy his new position. New job training will be provided when the Plaintiff is in a new workplace located in Tanjung Pinang. Termination of employment between the Plaintiff and the Defendant because the Plaintiff is absent is groundless. Because it is not proven that the Plaintiff committed a violation or a mistake. And the process of terminating the work done by the Defendant against the Plaintiff is contrary to the provisions of the prevailing laws and regulations. In Decision Number: 95 / Pdt.Sus-PHI / 2017 / PN.Pbr, it was stat that the termination of employment between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was due to the Defendant's efficiency