This paper focuses on the problem of combining multi-agent preference orderings of different alternatives into a single fused ordering, when the agents’ importance is expressed through a rank-ordering and not a set of weights. An enhanced version of the algorithm proposed by Yager (2001) is presented. The main advantages of the new algorithm are that: (i) it better reflects the multi-agent preference orderings and (ii) it is more versatile, since it admits preference orderings with omitted or incomparable alternatives. The description of the new algorithm is supported by a realistic example
If a decision maker prefers x to y to z, would he choose orderd set [x;z] or [y;x]? This article stu...
In this paper we address the problem of aggregating outranking situations in the presence of multipl...
peer reviewedIn this paper we address the problem of aggregating outranking situations in the presen...
This contribution focuses on the problem of combining multi-agent preference orderings of different ...
This contribution focuses on the problem of combining multi-agent preference orderings of different ...
This paper focuses on the problem of combining multi-agent preference orderings of different alterna...
Yager proposed an algorithm to combine multi-agent preference orderings of several alternatives into...
Yager proposed an algorithm to combine multi-agent preference orderings of several alternatives into...
The problem of aggregating multi-agent preference orderings has received considerable attention in m...
An interesting decision-making problem is that of aggregating multi-agent preference orderings into ...
An interesting decision-making problem is that of aggregating multi-agent preference orderings into ...
g m ch imp h de pa rac gs rank-ordering. A detailed description of the new algorithm is supported by...
If a decision maker prefers x to y to z, would he choose orderd set [x;z] or [y;x]? This article stu...
Producción CientíficaA general problem, which may concern practical contexts of different nature, is...
If a decision maker prefers x to y to z, would he choose orderd set [x;z] or [y;x]? This article stu...
If a decision maker prefers x to y to z, would he choose orderd set [x;z] or [y;x]? This article stu...
In this paper we address the problem of aggregating outranking situations in the presence of multipl...
peer reviewedIn this paper we address the problem of aggregating outranking situations in the presen...
This contribution focuses on the problem of combining multi-agent preference orderings of different ...
This contribution focuses on the problem of combining multi-agent preference orderings of different ...
This paper focuses on the problem of combining multi-agent preference orderings of different alterna...
Yager proposed an algorithm to combine multi-agent preference orderings of several alternatives into...
Yager proposed an algorithm to combine multi-agent preference orderings of several alternatives into...
The problem of aggregating multi-agent preference orderings has received considerable attention in m...
An interesting decision-making problem is that of aggregating multi-agent preference orderings into ...
An interesting decision-making problem is that of aggregating multi-agent preference orderings into ...
g m ch imp h de pa rac gs rank-ordering. A detailed description of the new algorithm is supported by...
If a decision maker prefers x to y to z, would he choose orderd set [x;z] or [y;x]? This article stu...
Producción CientíficaA general problem, which may concern practical contexts of different nature, is...
If a decision maker prefers x to y to z, would he choose orderd set [x;z] or [y;x]? This article stu...
If a decision maker prefers x to y to z, would he choose orderd set [x;z] or [y;x]? This article stu...
In this paper we address the problem of aggregating outranking situations in the presence of multipl...
peer reviewedIn this paper we address the problem of aggregating outranking situations in the presen...