The call for accountability in health care quality has fueled the development of consumer-oriented Web sites that provide hospital ratings. Taking the consumer perspective, we compared five Web sites to assess the level of agreement in their rankings of local hospitals for four diagnoses. The sites assessed different measures of structure, process, and outcomes and did not use consistent patient definitions or reporting periods. Consequently, they failed to agree on hospital rankings within any diagnosis, even when using the same metric (such as mortality). In their current state, rating services appear likely to confuse, rather than inform, consumers
Introduction: Nowadays, hospitals have turned increasingly towards the Internet and develop their ow...
International audienceContext The strategy of publicly reporting quality indicators is being widely ...
BACKGROUND: In the United States patients have limited opportunities to read and write narrative rev...
OBJECTIVE: To determine the consistency with which government-issued hospital quality ratings and cr...
BackgroundOur goal was to compare hospital scores from the most widely used commercial website in th...
Abstract Background Little is known about the usefulness of online ratings when searching for a hosp...
Public reporting of hospital performance holds tremendous promise for improving the care provided by...
Objective: To understand how the public understand comparative quality information as presented on N...
Hospitals and health systems are using web-based and social media tools to market themselves to cons...
Objective: To explore hospital comparison Web sites for general surgery based on: (1) a systematic I...
In line with the increasingly important role of patient-centered healthcare quality assessment, hosp...
The U.S. healthcare system consistently underperforms on crucial international comparisons, thereby ...
Background: In April 2005 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services launched "Hospital Com...
We examine the effects of diverse dimensions of hospital quality - including consumers' perceptions ...
Patient choice, particularly the choice of hospital, has been at the heart of health policy for a nu...
Introduction: Nowadays, hospitals have turned increasingly towards the Internet and develop their ow...
International audienceContext The strategy of publicly reporting quality indicators is being widely ...
BACKGROUND: In the United States patients have limited opportunities to read and write narrative rev...
OBJECTIVE: To determine the consistency with which government-issued hospital quality ratings and cr...
BackgroundOur goal was to compare hospital scores from the most widely used commercial website in th...
Abstract Background Little is known about the usefulness of online ratings when searching for a hosp...
Public reporting of hospital performance holds tremendous promise for improving the care provided by...
Objective: To understand how the public understand comparative quality information as presented on N...
Hospitals and health systems are using web-based and social media tools to market themselves to cons...
Objective: To explore hospital comparison Web sites for general surgery based on: (1) a systematic I...
In line with the increasingly important role of patient-centered healthcare quality assessment, hosp...
The U.S. healthcare system consistently underperforms on crucial international comparisons, thereby ...
Background: In April 2005 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services launched "Hospital Com...
We examine the effects of diverse dimensions of hospital quality - including consumers' perceptions ...
Patient choice, particularly the choice of hospital, has been at the heart of health policy for a nu...
Introduction: Nowadays, hospitals have turned increasingly towards the Internet and develop their ow...
International audienceContext The strategy of publicly reporting quality indicators is being widely ...
BACKGROUND: In the United States patients have limited opportunities to read and write narrative rev...