The impact of species loss from competitive communities partly depends on how populations of the surviving species respond. Predicting the response should be straightforward using models that describe population growth as a function of competitor densities; but these models require accurate estimates of interaction strengths. Here, we quantified how well we could predict responses to competitor removal in a community of annual plants, using a combination of observation and experiment. It was straightforward to fit models to multi-species communities, which passed standard diagnostic tests and provided apparently sensible estimates of interaction strengths. However, the models consistently underpredicted the response to competitor removal, b...
1 We tested the hypothesis that the competitive effect of multi-species mixtures on a single target ...
Theory predicts that intraspecific competition should be stronger than interspecific competition for...
A fundamental goal of ecology is to understand the determinants of species' distributions (i.e., the...
The impact of species loss from competitive communities partly depends on how populations of the sur...
The impact of species loss from competitive communities partly depends on how populations of the sur...
The impact of species loss from competitive communities partly depends on how populations of the sur...
Stable coexistence requires intraspecific limitations to be stronger than interspecific limitations....
Negative species co-occurrence patterns have long intrigued ecologists because of their potential li...
Very little is known about how variation in environmental conditions alters the strength and the str...
Competition between two species in a metapopulation involves each inhibiting the other's ability fir...
A fundamental assumption of coexistence theory is that competition inevitably decreases species dive...
1. Estimating the strength of interactions among species in natural communities has always been a ch...
Disturbances’ role in shaping communities is well documented but highly disputed. We suggest replaci...
A fundamental goal of ecology is to understand the determinants of species' distributions (i.e., the...
1 We tested the hypothesis that the competitive effect of multi-species mixtures on a single target ...
Theory predicts that intraspecific competition should be stronger than interspecific competition for...
A fundamental goal of ecology is to understand the determinants of species' distributions (i.e., the...
The impact of species loss from competitive communities partly depends on how populations of the sur...
The impact of species loss from competitive communities partly depends on how populations of the sur...
The impact of species loss from competitive communities partly depends on how populations of the sur...
Stable coexistence requires intraspecific limitations to be stronger than interspecific limitations....
Negative species co-occurrence patterns have long intrigued ecologists because of their potential li...
Very little is known about how variation in environmental conditions alters the strength and the str...
Competition between two species in a metapopulation involves each inhibiting the other's ability fir...
A fundamental assumption of coexistence theory is that competition inevitably decreases species dive...
1. Estimating the strength of interactions among species in natural communities has always been a ch...
Disturbances’ role in shaping communities is well documented but highly disputed. We suggest replaci...
A fundamental goal of ecology is to understand the determinants of species' distributions (i.e., the...
1 We tested the hypothesis that the competitive effect of multi-species mixtures on a single target ...
Theory predicts that intraspecific competition should be stronger than interspecific competition for...
A fundamental goal of ecology is to understand the determinants of species' distributions (i.e., the...