We examine the merits of subjecting an incumbent supplier of regulated services to antitrust review. We show that antitrust review can harm consumers even when the review entails no direct costs of implementation. The harm to consumers arises in part because imperfect antitrust review can crowd out more effective regulatory oversight. More generally, antitrust review can usefully complement regulatory oversight but affects the nature of the optimal regulatory policy
Direct regulation of public utility activity and behavior has been the predominant approach to prote...
Antitrust has a complex set of criminal and civil remedies enforced by a multiplicity of public and ...
Herbert Hovenkamp\u27s primary target in Antitrust\u27s Protected Classes is the Chicago School\u27s...
We examine the merits of subjecting an incumbent supplier of regulated services to antitrust review....
Antitrust law promotes competition in the service of economic efficiency. Government regulation may ...
Professor Havighurst exhaustively explores the antitrust implications of fee, utilization, and quali...
In Verizon v. Trinko, the Supreme Court set forth a new stance toward antitrust oversight of regulat...
Antitrust law is a residual regulator, picking up where legislative regulation leaves off. The relat...
Antitrust law is a blunt instrument for dealing with many claims of anticompetitive standard setting...
This essay analyzes the three papers presented on a panel I organized as chair of the AALS Antitrust...
When government regulates, it may either intentionally or unintentionally generate restraints that r...
Lately, much attention has been given to the scope of the antitrust laws. This discussion has two ov...
This article analyzes whether the Health Care Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA) effects any real chang...
This paper studies the interaction between regulation and antitrust. We consider a situation where ...
Numerous commentators have characterized the Roberts Court’s antitrust decisions as radical departur...
Direct regulation of public utility activity and behavior has been the predominant approach to prote...
Antitrust has a complex set of criminal and civil remedies enforced by a multiplicity of public and ...
Herbert Hovenkamp\u27s primary target in Antitrust\u27s Protected Classes is the Chicago School\u27s...
We examine the merits of subjecting an incumbent supplier of regulated services to antitrust review....
Antitrust law promotes competition in the service of economic efficiency. Government regulation may ...
Professor Havighurst exhaustively explores the antitrust implications of fee, utilization, and quali...
In Verizon v. Trinko, the Supreme Court set forth a new stance toward antitrust oversight of regulat...
Antitrust law is a residual regulator, picking up where legislative regulation leaves off. The relat...
Antitrust law is a blunt instrument for dealing with many claims of anticompetitive standard setting...
This essay analyzes the three papers presented on a panel I organized as chair of the AALS Antitrust...
When government regulates, it may either intentionally or unintentionally generate restraints that r...
Lately, much attention has been given to the scope of the antitrust laws. This discussion has two ov...
This article analyzes whether the Health Care Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA) effects any real chang...
This paper studies the interaction between regulation and antitrust. We consider a situation where ...
Numerous commentators have characterized the Roberts Court’s antitrust decisions as radical departur...
Direct regulation of public utility activity and behavior has been the predominant approach to prote...
Antitrust has a complex set of criminal and civil remedies enforced by a multiplicity of public and ...
Herbert Hovenkamp\u27s primary target in Antitrust\u27s Protected Classes is the Chicago School\u27s...