Takings doctrine, we are constantly reminded, is unclear to the point of incoherence. The task of finding our way through it has become more difficult, and yet more interesting, with the Supreme Court\u27s recent, inconclusive foray into the arena of judicial takings in Stop the Beach Renourishment. Following guideposts in Kelo, Lingle, and earlier cases, this essay uses a series of simple diagrams to examine how elements of takings jurisprudence fit together with each other and with other limits on governmental action. Visualizing takings in this manner yields surprising lessons for judicial takings and for takings law more generally
Takings scholarship has long focused on the niceties of Supreme Court doctrine, while ignoring the o...
This Article presents an empirical study of takings litigation against the United States. It review...
Takings scholarship has long focused on the niceties of Supreme Court doctrine, while ignoring the o...
Takings doctrine, we are constantly reminded, is unclear to the point of incoherence. The task of fi...
In Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, a four-memb...
Regulatory takings law today is criticized as a confused muddle, intractable, and as an ambiguous ar...
Takings jurisprudence has long been and remains, in the opinion of many, a constitutional quagmire, ...
This brief paper is a primer on and critique of judicial takings after Stop the Beach. Judicial taki...
When the Supreme Court recently dipped its toe into longstanding debates about judicial takings in S...
In Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection,1 the U.S. S...
The U.S. Supreme Court waded into the waters of judicial takings last summer with a divided opinion ...
Takings doctrine is a mess. Let\u27s just accept that and establish specialized federal and state t...
To provide some insight into the nature of these disagreements, and to suggest a possible solution t...
In Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 130 S. Ct. 2592 (...
The future of judicial takings may rest on the ability of the Court to define property in a robust a...
Takings scholarship has long focused on the niceties of Supreme Court doctrine, while ignoring the o...
This Article presents an empirical study of takings litigation against the United States. It review...
Takings scholarship has long focused on the niceties of Supreme Court doctrine, while ignoring the o...
Takings doctrine, we are constantly reminded, is unclear to the point of incoherence. The task of fi...
In Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, a four-memb...
Regulatory takings law today is criticized as a confused muddle, intractable, and as an ambiguous ar...
Takings jurisprudence has long been and remains, in the opinion of many, a constitutional quagmire, ...
This brief paper is a primer on and critique of judicial takings after Stop the Beach. Judicial taki...
When the Supreme Court recently dipped its toe into longstanding debates about judicial takings in S...
In Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection,1 the U.S. S...
The U.S. Supreme Court waded into the waters of judicial takings last summer with a divided opinion ...
Takings doctrine is a mess. Let\u27s just accept that and establish specialized federal and state t...
To provide some insight into the nature of these disagreements, and to suggest a possible solution t...
In Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 130 S. Ct. 2592 (...
The future of judicial takings may rest on the ability of the Court to define property in a robust a...
Takings scholarship has long focused on the niceties of Supreme Court doctrine, while ignoring the o...
This Article presents an empirical study of takings litigation against the United States. It review...
Takings scholarship has long focused on the niceties of Supreme Court doctrine, while ignoring the o...