The fact that a substantial percentage of Supreme Court decisions are unanimous is often used to undermine the theory that the Court\u27s decisions are ideologically driven. We argue that if the ideological stakes in a case are small, even slight dissent aversion is likely to produce a unanimous decision. The data support this interpretation but also establish the existence of an ideological effect in unanimous decisions. These findings are consistent with a realistic conception of the Court as a mixed ideological-legalistic judicial institution
Although scholars increasingly acknowledge a contemporaneous relationship between public opinion and...
For many decades, the United States has been conducting an extraordinary natural experiment: Randoml...
Do judicial dissents affect mass politics? Many people, including judges, scholars, political commen...
The fact that a substantial percentage of Supreme Court decisions are unanimous is often used to und...
Most scholarship on Supreme Court decision making assumes that justices’ ideological preferences exh...
Models using judicial ideology to explain Supreme Court decision-making remain controver-sial due to...
Political scientists have developed increasingly sophisticated understandings of the influences on S...
Studying a high-stakes field setting, we examine which individuals, on an ideological scale, conform...
Conventional wisdom says that individuals’ ideological preferences do not influence Supreme Court le...
A key influence on governance and regulation is the ideology of individual decisionmakers. However, ...
In contrast to the standard conception of a U.S. Supreme Court striving to produce ideologically opt...
Hyperbole is the common response in the wake of any Supreme Court decision, but which cases have a l...
Like Congress and other deliberative bodies, the Supreme Court decides its cases by majority vote. I...
Contrasted with the other branches of government, the Supreme Court has long been an institution pos...
The Unanimous Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada as a Test of the Attitudinal Model Most of th...
Although scholars increasingly acknowledge a contemporaneous relationship between public opinion and...
For many decades, the United States has been conducting an extraordinary natural experiment: Randoml...
Do judicial dissents affect mass politics? Many people, including judges, scholars, political commen...
The fact that a substantial percentage of Supreme Court decisions are unanimous is often used to und...
Most scholarship on Supreme Court decision making assumes that justices’ ideological preferences exh...
Models using judicial ideology to explain Supreme Court decision-making remain controver-sial due to...
Political scientists have developed increasingly sophisticated understandings of the influences on S...
Studying a high-stakes field setting, we examine which individuals, on an ideological scale, conform...
Conventional wisdom says that individuals’ ideological preferences do not influence Supreme Court le...
A key influence on governance and regulation is the ideology of individual decisionmakers. However, ...
In contrast to the standard conception of a U.S. Supreme Court striving to produce ideologically opt...
Hyperbole is the common response in the wake of any Supreme Court decision, but which cases have a l...
Like Congress and other deliberative bodies, the Supreme Court decides its cases by majority vote. I...
Contrasted with the other branches of government, the Supreme Court has long been an institution pos...
The Unanimous Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada as a Test of the Attitudinal Model Most of th...
Although scholars increasingly acknowledge a contemporaneous relationship between public opinion and...
For many decades, the United States has been conducting an extraordinary natural experiment: Randoml...
Do judicial dissents affect mass politics? Many people, including judges, scholars, political commen...