Section 5(m) of the Federal Trade Commission Act promises to greatly enhance the Commission\u27s consumer protection role. For the first time in its history, the FTC is empowered to enforce the law of deceptive trade practices, embodied in its rules and case determinations, through civil penalty actions against firms that are not themselves subject to Commission cease and desist orders. It is far from clear, however, how section 5(m) will work in practice, for the statute is ambiguous on many important questions and silent on others. In this article Mr. Bickart identifies and examines certain major problems with the statute that the courts and the Commission will soon confront
A more detailed analysis of the Federal Trade Commission Improvements Act of 1980 follows
Section 5(b) of the Clayton Act, which provides for suspension of the applicable statute of limitati...
Scholars have long argued that Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act can or should be interp...
Section 5(m) of the Federal Trade Commission Act promises to greatly enhance the Commission\u27s con...
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which enforces the Clayton, Sherman and FTC Acts, has statuto...
ABSTRACT: State Consumer Protection Acts (CPAs) were designed to supplement the Federal Trade Commis...
The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 didn’t just create a new agency. It created new law for tha...
Although the primary responsibility for the enforcement of the antitrust laws falls upon governmenta...
Since the 1970’s, U.S. courts generally have narrowed the range of single-firm behavior subject to c...
Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act makes unfair methods of competition illegal and give...
This topic is a constellation of antitrust highlights. Within the past five years the Federal Trade ...
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has regulated competitive business activities since its inception...
State Consumer Protection Acts (CPAs) were designed to supplement the Federal Trade Commission’s (FT...
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) may face an existential threat to its ability to hold corporate l...
A cease and desist order is not entered in a vacuum. What an order should say or require depends upo...
A more detailed analysis of the Federal Trade Commission Improvements Act of 1980 follows
Section 5(b) of the Clayton Act, which provides for suspension of the applicable statute of limitati...
Scholars have long argued that Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act can or should be interp...
Section 5(m) of the Federal Trade Commission Act promises to greatly enhance the Commission\u27s con...
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which enforces the Clayton, Sherman and FTC Acts, has statuto...
ABSTRACT: State Consumer Protection Acts (CPAs) were designed to supplement the Federal Trade Commis...
The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 didn’t just create a new agency. It created new law for tha...
Although the primary responsibility for the enforcement of the antitrust laws falls upon governmenta...
Since the 1970’s, U.S. courts generally have narrowed the range of single-firm behavior subject to c...
Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act makes unfair methods of competition illegal and give...
This topic is a constellation of antitrust highlights. Within the past five years the Federal Trade ...
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has regulated competitive business activities since its inception...
State Consumer Protection Acts (CPAs) were designed to supplement the Federal Trade Commission’s (FT...
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) may face an existential threat to its ability to hold corporate l...
A cease and desist order is not entered in a vacuum. What an order should say or require depends upo...
A more detailed analysis of the Federal Trade Commission Improvements Act of 1980 follows
Section 5(b) of the Clayton Act, which provides for suspension of the applicable statute of limitati...
Scholars have long argued that Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act can or should be interp...