This essay criticizes the United Nations Charter\u27s standard for the use of force, and outlines a different but still constructive role for the UN in some critical domains. In Part II, we point to serious flaws inherent in the structure of the United Nations Charter rules, particularly the ex ante requirements that nations must satisfy prior to engaging in the use of force. Parts III and IV suggest more modest types of roles that the United Nations could occupy, and how the organization can help promote international security without endangering the security interests of its respective members
When the United Nations (UN) Charter was adopted, it was generally considered to have outlawed war. ...
The United Nations Charter's use of force paradigm prohibits all uses of force by states except in r...
The original 2001 United Nations (UN) codification of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) granted th...
This essay criticizes the United Nations Charter\u27s standard for the use of force, and outlines a ...
This Article has three parts. Part I will discuss the existing legal framework established by the UN...
The fortieth anniversary of the United Nations has occasioned both celebration and sober reassessmen...
Since the adoption of the U.N. Charter in 1945, there has been almost continuous debate regarding th...
Force and the Charter is a very complex problem. It imports not merely the place of force in the rel...
The question of United Nations peacekeeping and the use of force might seem to be a specialized topi...
The UN Charter reflects the drafters’ singular focus on creating a political system to govern confli...
When one views the UN up close, in the field and in New York, much of the unsteadiness in dischargin...
American policy makers and international lawyers sit in a parallel universe. Policy makers determine...
We found that the post-World War II international security system as provided for in the United Nati...
After two years of close observation of the United Nations struggling to answer the challenge of Art...
This Article explores how concerns regarding the United Nations\u27 authority to make political, str...
When the United Nations (UN) Charter was adopted, it was generally considered to have outlawed war. ...
The United Nations Charter's use of force paradigm prohibits all uses of force by states except in r...
The original 2001 United Nations (UN) codification of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) granted th...
This essay criticizes the United Nations Charter\u27s standard for the use of force, and outlines a ...
This Article has three parts. Part I will discuss the existing legal framework established by the UN...
The fortieth anniversary of the United Nations has occasioned both celebration and sober reassessmen...
Since the adoption of the U.N. Charter in 1945, there has been almost continuous debate regarding th...
Force and the Charter is a very complex problem. It imports not merely the place of force in the rel...
The question of United Nations peacekeeping and the use of force might seem to be a specialized topi...
The UN Charter reflects the drafters’ singular focus on creating a political system to govern confli...
When one views the UN up close, in the field and in New York, much of the unsteadiness in dischargin...
American policy makers and international lawyers sit in a parallel universe. Policy makers determine...
We found that the post-World War II international security system as provided for in the United Nati...
After two years of close observation of the United Nations struggling to answer the challenge of Art...
This Article explores how concerns regarding the United Nations\u27 authority to make political, str...
When the United Nations (UN) Charter was adopted, it was generally considered to have outlawed war. ...
The United Nations Charter's use of force paradigm prohibits all uses of force by states except in r...
The original 2001 United Nations (UN) codification of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) granted th...