Add to ORKGJustice Scalia\u27s engaging essay, “Common-Law Courts in a Civil-Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws,” and the four comments it provokes, should provide lawyers, judges, and other lawmakers with an interesting evening. Instead of presenting a theoretical view of the role of the federal courts in interpretation, Justice Scalia sketches out a case for “textualism.” “Textualism” is one of several currently contending methods of interpreting statutes and the United States Constitution, and is currently popular among federal judges who see their role as restricting government\u27s powers to those expressly stated in the written text
Every Justice, save perhaps Justice Breyer, has recently subscribed to an opinion raising questions ...
The Supreme Court teaches that federal courts, unlike their counterparts in the states, are not gene...
The last decade has been a remarkable one for statutory interpretation. For most of our history, Ame...
Review of A MATTER OF INTERPRETATION: FEDERAL COURTS AND THE LAW by Antonin Scali
Review of A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law by Antonin Scalia
Justice Scalia defends textualism as the only form of interpretation that should govern judicial int...
Scholars have long debated the separation of powers question of what judicial power federal courts h...
The late Justice Antonin Scalia reshaped statutory interpretation. Thanks to him, the Supreme Court ...
Let me identify the two basic theses of this paper. First, I believe that in the recent Schiavone v....
article published in law reviewThere is a peculiar point of agreement between prominent defenders of...
The burgeoning literature on transjudicialism and constitutional comparativism generally reaffirms t...
In Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and Amer...
Review of A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law by Antonin Scalia
A key doctrinal debate in statutory interpretation today revolves around the claim that courts shoul...
It seems beyond bizarre to ask whether Justice Scalia had a theory of textual interpretation. If he ...
Every Justice, save perhaps Justice Breyer, has recently subscribed to an opinion raising questions ...
The Supreme Court teaches that federal courts, unlike their counterparts in the states, are not gene...
The last decade has been a remarkable one for statutory interpretation. For most of our history, Ame...
Review of A MATTER OF INTERPRETATION: FEDERAL COURTS AND THE LAW by Antonin Scali
Review of A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law by Antonin Scalia
Justice Scalia defends textualism as the only form of interpretation that should govern judicial int...
Scholars have long debated the separation of powers question of what judicial power federal courts h...
The late Justice Antonin Scalia reshaped statutory interpretation. Thanks to him, the Supreme Court ...
Let me identify the two basic theses of this paper. First, I believe that in the recent Schiavone v....
article published in law reviewThere is a peculiar point of agreement between prominent defenders of...
The burgeoning literature on transjudicialism and constitutional comparativism generally reaffirms t...
In Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and Amer...
Review of A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law by Antonin Scalia
A key doctrinal debate in statutory interpretation today revolves around the claim that courts shoul...
It seems beyond bizarre to ask whether Justice Scalia had a theory of textual interpretation. If he ...
Every Justice, save perhaps Justice Breyer, has recently subscribed to an opinion raising questions ...
The Supreme Court teaches that federal courts, unlike their counterparts in the states, are not gene...
The last decade has been a remarkable one for statutory interpretation. For most of our history, Ame...