On January 14, 2009, the United States Supreme Court decided Herring v. United States. In Herring, the defendant moved to suppress evidence that he alleged was seized as a result of an arrest that violated the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court approved the decision below to deny suppression of the evidence. The decision set off a flurry of speculation that the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule would not see its 100th birthday in 2014. A headline in the New York Times of January 31 declared: “Supreme Court Edging Closer to Repeal of Evidence Ruling.” Another headline in the Times, this one on February 16, asked: “Is the Supreme Court About to Kill off the Exclusionary Rule?” A headline in the April...
The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule began to unravel in United States v. Leon. The facts were com...
The fourth amendment guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, pape...
More than 50 years have passed since the Supreme Court decided the Weeks case, barring the use in fe...
On January 14, 2009, the United States Supreme Court decided Herring v. United States. In Herring, t...
In three recent decisions, Hudson v. Michigan, Herring v. United States, and last Term\u27s Davis v....
At its inception, the exclusionary rule was relatively straightforward: The use at trial of evidence...
This Article discusses the Supreme Court’s use of the concepts of culpability and deterrence in its ...
In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Warren Court held that the so-called exclusionary rule was applicable to...
This Article addresses the questions left unanswered by the Supreme Court’s recent exclusionary rule...
Much of the Supreme Court’s contemporary Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule jurisprudence is constru...
The justices of the Supreme Court have drawn new battle lines over the exclusionary rule. In Hudson ...
This Note will review briefly the history of the exclusionary rule under fourth amendment jurisprude...
This symposium, comprising six articles in addition to this one, was triggered by a spate of Supreme...
The exclusionary rule itself is not very complicated: if the police obtain evidence by means that vi...
Can we live with the so-called exclusionary rule, which bars the use of illegally gained evidence in...
The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule began to unravel in United States v. Leon. The facts were com...
The fourth amendment guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, pape...
More than 50 years have passed since the Supreme Court decided the Weeks case, barring the use in fe...
On January 14, 2009, the United States Supreme Court decided Herring v. United States. In Herring, t...
In three recent decisions, Hudson v. Michigan, Herring v. United States, and last Term\u27s Davis v....
At its inception, the exclusionary rule was relatively straightforward: The use at trial of evidence...
This Article discusses the Supreme Court’s use of the concepts of culpability and deterrence in its ...
In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Warren Court held that the so-called exclusionary rule was applicable to...
This Article addresses the questions left unanswered by the Supreme Court’s recent exclusionary rule...
Much of the Supreme Court’s contemporary Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule jurisprudence is constru...
The justices of the Supreme Court have drawn new battle lines over the exclusionary rule. In Hudson ...
This Note will review briefly the history of the exclusionary rule under fourth amendment jurisprude...
This symposium, comprising six articles in addition to this one, was triggered by a spate of Supreme...
The exclusionary rule itself is not very complicated: if the police obtain evidence by means that vi...
Can we live with the so-called exclusionary rule, which bars the use of illegally gained evidence in...
The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule began to unravel in United States v. Leon. The facts were com...
The fourth amendment guarantees the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, pape...
More than 50 years have passed since the Supreme Court decided the Weeks case, barring the use in fe...