The last number of Informal Logic, Vol. 37, No. 3, was devoted to a discussion by five scholars of various aspects of Harald Wohlrapp’s book, The Concept of Argument, detailing its innovative features and exploring some of the questions raised by his account. In this issue, we are pleased to provide Professor Wohlrapp’s extensive responses to those papers. He here elaborates further on the approach he takes to the study of argument, clarifying a number of points that were raised and replying to objections
Over the past 60 years there have been tremendous advances made in the inter-disciplinary area known...
The paper argues that argument and argumentation deserve philosophical attention but do not receive ...
This chapter discusses how formal models of argumentation can clarify philosophical problems and iss...
The paper provides a series of responses to the papers published in Vol. 37, No. 3, of this journal ...
In this special issue, we are fortunate to be able to publish a series of papers on Harald Wohlrapp...
I would first like to congratulate Harald Wohlrapp on the substantial success of his book on the phi...
The challenges of the global time require new solutions and up-to-date ways of thinking and communic...
This special issue devoted to Informal Logic and Theory of Argumentation attempts to offer some cont...
We are pleased to release this edition of Ralph Johnson’s The Rise of Informal Logic as Volume 2 in ...
Harald Wohlrapp’s The Concept of Argument has made a significant contribution to the argumentation t...
When a new theory of argumentation becomes available on the English-speaking market, such as it is h...
We are pleased to release this digital edition of Ralph Johnson’s The Rise of Informal Logic as Volu...
The first two sections of this paper jointly comprise an edited version of the commentary I presente...
(= Two special issues of the Journal "Informal Logic": 3.25 (2005), pp. 189-287; and 1.26 (2006), pp...
Over the past 60 years there have been tremendous advances made in the inter-disciplinary area known...
The paper argues that argument and argumentation deserve philosophical attention but do not receive ...
This chapter discusses how formal models of argumentation can clarify philosophical problems and iss...
The paper provides a series of responses to the papers published in Vol. 37, No. 3, of this journal ...
In this special issue, we are fortunate to be able to publish a series of papers on Harald Wohlrapp...
I would first like to congratulate Harald Wohlrapp on the substantial success of his book on the phi...
The challenges of the global time require new solutions and up-to-date ways of thinking and communic...
This special issue devoted to Informal Logic and Theory of Argumentation attempts to offer some cont...
We are pleased to release this edition of Ralph Johnson’s The Rise of Informal Logic as Volume 2 in ...
Harald Wohlrapp’s The Concept of Argument has made a significant contribution to the argumentation t...
When a new theory of argumentation becomes available on the English-speaking market, such as it is h...
We are pleased to release this digital edition of Ralph Johnson’s The Rise of Informal Logic as Volu...
The first two sections of this paper jointly comprise an edited version of the commentary I presente...
(= Two special issues of the Journal "Informal Logic": 3.25 (2005), pp. 189-287; and 1.26 (2006), pp...
Over the past 60 years there have been tremendous advances made in the inter-disciplinary area known...
The paper argues that argument and argumentation deserve philosophical attention but do not receive ...
This chapter discusses how formal models of argumentation can clarify philosophical problems and iss...