This essay argues that ideals of cooperation or adversariality in argumentation are not equally attainable for women. Women in argumentation contexts face oppress-sive limitations undermining argument success because their authority is un-dermined by gendered norms of po-liteness. Women endorsing or, alter-natively, transgressing feminine norms of politeness typically defend their au-thority in argumentation contexts. And yet, defending authority renders it less legitimate. My argument focuses on women in philosophy but bears the implication that other masculine dis-course contexts present similar double binds that urge social and political change
This study contributes to the growing body of research on gender and writing and extends previous re...
This chapter challenges the common claim that vicious forms of argumentative practice, like interper...
Abstract Argument is seen as central to philosophy, especially epistemology. It is often s...
This essay argues that ideals of cooperation or adversariality in argumentation are not equally atta...
Feminists note an association of arguing with aggression and masculinity and question the necessity ...
In Chapter One, I discuss some of the characteristics and limitations associated with the traditiona...
Trudy Govier argues in The Philosophy of Argument that adversariality in argumentation can be kept t...
This paper critically examines non-adversarial feminist argumentation model specifically within the ...
The first part of this paper will look at how essential features of power and authority affect the c...
Socialization enforces gendered standards of politeness that encourage men to be dominating and wome...
Philosophy’s adversarial argumentation style is often noted as a factor contributing to the low numb...
It has been accepted for some time within Communication Theory that there are identifiable differenc...
My paper is addressed to two related questions: What are the feminist issues concerning argument/arg...
Teaching within institutions that prototypically privilege the social order of language is often pro...
This dissertation explores the relationship between gender and argumentation, complicating narrative...
This study contributes to the growing body of research on gender and writing and extends previous re...
This chapter challenges the common claim that vicious forms of argumentative practice, like interper...
Abstract Argument is seen as central to philosophy, especially epistemology. It is often s...
This essay argues that ideals of cooperation or adversariality in argumentation are not equally atta...
Feminists note an association of arguing with aggression and masculinity and question the necessity ...
In Chapter One, I discuss some of the characteristics and limitations associated with the traditiona...
Trudy Govier argues in The Philosophy of Argument that adversariality in argumentation can be kept t...
This paper critically examines non-adversarial feminist argumentation model specifically within the ...
The first part of this paper will look at how essential features of power and authority affect the c...
Socialization enforces gendered standards of politeness that encourage men to be dominating and wome...
Philosophy’s adversarial argumentation style is often noted as a factor contributing to the low numb...
It has been accepted for some time within Communication Theory that there are identifiable differenc...
My paper is addressed to two related questions: What are the feminist issues concerning argument/arg...
Teaching within institutions that prototypically privilege the social order of language is often pro...
This dissertation explores the relationship between gender and argumentation, complicating narrative...
This study contributes to the growing body of research on gender and writing and extends previous re...
This chapter challenges the common claim that vicious forms of argumentative practice, like interper...
Abstract Argument is seen as central to philosophy, especially epistemology. It is often s...