An infonnal fallacy is a reasoning error with three features: the reasoning employs an implicit cogent pattern; the fallacy results from one or more false premises; there is culpable ignorance or deception associated with the falsity of the premises. A reconstruction and analysis of the cogent reasoning patterns in fourteen standard infonnal fallacy types plus several variations are given. Defense of the CMR account covers: a general failure to apply the principle of charity in informal fallacy contexts; empirical evidence for it; how it explains Walton's point that there are both fallacious and non-fallacious instances of fallacy types; how it avoids most "relevance" problems, pennits clearer taxonomizing, and promises pedagogical advantag...
Taken with kind permission from the book Why Brilliant People Believe Nonsense by J. Steve Miller an...
Taken with kind permission from the book Why Brilliant People Believe Nonsense by J. Steve Miller an...
This book is a sequel to the classic work, Fallacies Selected Papers 1972 - 1982 (1989), coauthored ...
The author designed the Reasoning Analysis Test to provide empirical support for the CRM analysis of...
Fallacies of relevance, a major category of informal fallacies, include two that could be called pur...
ing Analysis Test to provide empirical sup-port for the CRM analysis of informal falla-cies. While i...
that could be called pure fallacies of relevance-the wrong conclusion (ignoratio elenchi, wrong conc...
While we acknowledge the inadequacy of the standard treatment of fallacies (see Hamblin 1970, p. 12)...
The paper argues that the two best known formal logical fallacies, namely denying the antecedent (DA...
The public must make assessments of a range of health-related issues. However, these assessments req...
We examine in detail three classic reasoning fallacies, that is, supposedly ``incorrect'' forms of a...
We examine in detail three classic reasoning fallacies, that is, supposedly ``incorrect'' forms of a...
While we acknowledge the inadequacy of the standard treatment of fallacies (see Hamblin 1970, p. 12)...
Classical informal reasoning "fallacies," for example, begging the question or arguing from ignoranc...
This paper offers a solution to the problem of understanding how a fallacious argument can be decept...
Taken with kind permission from the book Why Brilliant People Believe Nonsense by J. Steve Miller an...
Taken with kind permission from the book Why Brilliant People Believe Nonsense by J. Steve Miller an...
This book is a sequel to the classic work, Fallacies Selected Papers 1972 - 1982 (1989), coauthored ...
The author designed the Reasoning Analysis Test to provide empirical support for the CRM analysis of...
Fallacies of relevance, a major category of informal fallacies, include two that could be called pur...
ing Analysis Test to provide empirical sup-port for the CRM analysis of informal falla-cies. While i...
that could be called pure fallacies of relevance-the wrong conclusion (ignoratio elenchi, wrong conc...
While we acknowledge the inadequacy of the standard treatment of fallacies (see Hamblin 1970, p. 12)...
The paper argues that the two best known formal logical fallacies, namely denying the antecedent (DA...
The public must make assessments of a range of health-related issues. However, these assessments req...
We examine in detail three classic reasoning fallacies, that is, supposedly ``incorrect'' forms of a...
We examine in detail three classic reasoning fallacies, that is, supposedly ``incorrect'' forms of a...
While we acknowledge the inadequacy of the standard treatment of fallacies (see Hamblin 1970, p. 12)...
Classical informal reasoning "fallacies," for example, begging the question or arguing from ignoranc...
This paper offers a solution to the problem of understanding how a fallacious argument can be decept...
Taken with kind permission from the book Why Brilliant People Believe Nonsense by J. Steve Miller an...
Taken with kind permission from the book Why Brilliant People Believe Nonsense by J. Steve Miller an...
This book is a sequel to the classic work, Fallacies Selected Papers 1972 - 1982 (1989), coauthored ...