Five errors that fit under the category of jumping to a conclusion are identified: (1) arguing from premises that are insufficient asevidence to prove a conclusion (2) fallacious argument from ignorance, (3) arguing to a wrong conclusion, (4) using defeasible reasoning without being open to exceptions, and (5) overlooking/suppressing evidence. It is shown that jumping to a conclusion is best seen not as a fallacy itself, but as a more general category of faulty argumentation pattern underlying these errors and some related fallacies
In this paper I identify a fallacy. The fallacy is worth noting for practical and theoretical reason...
This book is a sequel to the classic work, Fallacies Selected Papers 1972 - 1982 (1989), coauthored ...
While we acknowledge the inadequacy of the standard treatment of fallacies (see Hamblin 1970, p. 12)...
Fallacies of relevance, a major category of informal fallacies, include two that could be called pur...
Philosophers of science have given up on the quest for a silver bullet to put an end to all pseudosc...
This paper offers a solution to the problem of understanding how a fallacious argument can be decept...
that could be called pure fallacies of relevance-the wrong conclusion (ignoratio elenchi, wrong conc...
Abstract Philosophers of science have given up on the quest for a silver bullet to put an end to all...
To help students identify logical fallacies, the harm of those fallacies, and how they might pinpoin...
This paper provides a preliminary account of fallacies on Toulmin’s model of argument, one that impr...
This paper argues that recent theoretical attempts to understand fallacious reasoning fail because t...
Part six of a six-part series on critical reasoning. In this final lecture we will look at fallacies...
One result of successful argumentation – able arguers presenting cogent arguments to competent audie...
In this paper, an analysis is given of the straw man fallacy as a misrepresentation of someone'...
Part six of a six-part series on critical reasoning. In this final lecture we will look at fallacies...
In this paper I identify a fallacy. The fallacy is worth noting for practical and theoretical reason...
This book is a sequel to the classic work, Fallacies Selected Papers 1972 - 1982 (1989), coauthored ...
While we acknowledge the inadequacy of the standard treatment of fallacies (see Hamblin 1970, p. 12)...
Fallacies of relevance, a major category of informal fallacies, include two that could be called pur...
Philosophers of science have given up on the quest for a silver bullet to put an end to all pseudosc...
This paper offers a solution to the problem of understanding how a fallacious argument can be decept...
that could be called pure fallacies of relevance-the wrong conclusion (ignoratio elenchi, wrong conc...
Abstract Philosophers of science have given up on the quest for a silver bullet to put an end to all...
To help students identify logical fallacies, the harm of those fallacies, and how they might pinpoin...
This paper provides a preliminary account of fallacies on Toulmin’s model of argument, one that impr...
This paper argues that recent theoretical attempts to understand fallacious reasoning fail because t...
Part six of a six-part series on critical reasoning. In this final lecture we will look at fallacies...
One result of successful argumentation – able arguers presenting cogent arguments to competent audie...
In this paper, an analysis is given of the straw man fallacy as a misrepresentation of someone'...
Part six of a six-part series on critical reasoning. In this final lecture we will look at fallacies...
In this paper I identify a fallacy. The fallacy is worth noting for practical and theoretical reason...
This book is a sequel to the classic work, Fallacies Selected Papers 1972 - 1982 (1989), coauthored ...
While we acknowledge the inadequacy of the standard treatment of fallacies (see Hamblin 1970, p. 12)...