In June of 2003, the debate over the use of race-based preferential treatment in university and college admissions reached the chambers of our nation’s highest court. In two controversial cases, the United StatesSupreme Court upheld the use of race as a “plus” factor in the college admissions process. While the decision was a victory for advocates of racial affirmative action, the use of preferential treatment of racial minoritiesdoes not address the real problem of college admissions: the growing economic segregation on America’s campuses of higher education. It is the belief of the author that affirmative action in college admissions mustcontinue, but that preferences should target economic disadvantage rather than race in the admissions ...
This article proceeds in three parts. In Part I of this article, I provide a narrative of affirmativ...
College admissions committees, not markets, ration access to many of the most selective U.S. college...
Last year\u27s Supreme Court decisions on affirmative action, Gratz and Grutter, are dubious as cons...
Higher education is the door to opportunity for social advancement in our society and is often tied ...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
The Supreme Court has established the parameters within which universities can practice race-conscio...
The Supreme Court has established the parameters within which universities can practice race-conscio...
The Supreme Court has established the parameters within which universities can practice race-conscio...
Preferential treatment based on race is currently on life support and will soon die as a part of the...
The Supreme Court has established the parameters within which universities can practice race-conscio...
This article proceeds in three parts. In Part I of this article, I provide a narrative of affirmativ...
College admissions committees, not markets, ration access to many of the most selective U.S. college...
Last year\u27s Supreme Court decisions on affirmative action, Gratz and Grutter, are dubious as cons...
Higher education is the door to opportunity for social advancement in our society and is often tied ...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
In Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, the United States Supreme Court affirmed well-establishe...
The Supreme Court has established the parameters within which universities can practice race-conscio...
The Supreme Court has established the parameters within which universities can practice race-conscio...
The Supreme Court has established the parameters within which universities can practice race-conscio...
Preferential treatment based on race is currently on life support and will soon die as a part of the...
The Supreme Court has established the parameters within which universities can practice race-conscio...
This article proceeds in three parts. In Part I of this article, I provide a narrative of affirmativ...
College admissions committees, not markets, ration access to many of the most selective U.S. college...
Last year\u27s Supreme Court decisions on affirmative action, Gratz and Grutter, are dubious as cons...