This Article presents three legal theories that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) could employ in order for it to effectively enforce the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) requirements for stationary sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA) when the PSD violations are arguably beyond the five-year statute of limitations. In doing so, the Article explores various hurdles EPA would encounter. It also presents legal and policy arguments explaining why the courts should allow EPA to enforce PSD despite the statute of limitations
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit) is poised to become a prime ba...
The link between air pollution and poor public health is well known and has been farther documented ...
Does the United States need the Clean Air Act’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) progra...
The volume of NOX andSO2 emissions each year from unregulated, grandfathered power plants demonstrat...
The Clean Air Act (CAA) includes enforcement provisions by which violators of the Act can be held ci...
In Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. EPA, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of ...
Many years prior to TSCA, Congress enacted a general five-year statute of limitations for actions fo...
Includes bibliographical references.Abstract in HTML and technical report in PDF available on the Ma...
The Clean Air Act’s (CAAs) visibility protection program was created in 1977 and expanded in 1990. I...
The prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) program is a construction permitting program for n...
The urgent need to cool the atmosphere and slow the effects of climate change is evident all around ...
With the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Power Plan blocked in court and facing a...
This Article probes the convoluted ameliorative provisions of the 1977 Amendments in three parts. Se...
Penn Law’s Environmental Law Project recently submitted a comment to the U.S. Environmental Protecti...
Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (the Act) governs the regulation of hazardous air pollutants. From ...
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit) is poised to become a prime ba...
The link between air pollution and poor public health is well known and has been farther documented ...
Does the United States need the Clean Air Act’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) progra...
The volume of NOX andSO2 emissions each year from unregulated, grandfathered power plants demonstrat...
The Clean Air Act (CAA) includes enforcement provisions by which violators of the Act can be held ci...
In Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation v. EPA, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of ...
Many years prior to TSCA, Congress enacted a general five-year statute of limitations for actions fo...
Includes bibliographical references.Abstract in HTML and technical report in PDF available on the Ma...
The Clean Air Act’s (CAAs) visibility protection program was created in 1977 and expanded in 1990. I...
The prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) program is a construction permitting program for n...
The urgent need to cool the atmosphere and slow the effects of climate change is evident all around ...
With the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Power Plan blocked in court and facing a...
This Article probes the convoluted ameliorative provisions of the 1977 Amendments in three parts. Se...
Penn Law’s Environmental Law Project recently submitted a comment to the U.S. Environmental Protecti...
Section 112 of the Clean Air Act (the Act) governs the regulation of hazardous air pollutants. From ...
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit) is poised to become a prime ba...
The link between air pollution and poor public health is well known and has been farther documented ...
Does the United States need the Clean Air Act’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) progra...