The study by Kelly et al. on the Istanbul Protocol (IP) was made in three low-income countries. It is based on eighty interviews of human rights practitioners who in “many cases… were lawyers, but clinicians and other human rights professionals were also included.” (p63) The study does not provide a breakdown of the individuals interviewed, their professions, or their experience in documentation and specifically medico-legal or IP documentation. The study does not assume interviewees had any prior knowledge of the IP. In addition, health professionals – a key group that implements the IP – do not appear to be well represented among the interview group
Summary“Does torture prevention work?” is a very comprehensive book based on commendably profound re...
Background: The National Consortium of Torture Treatment Programs conducted a large voluntary resear...
Welcome to the Torture Journal Forensic Case Series, a new section of the Torture Journal. Through t...
We would like to thank the editors and the commentators for their comments and the opportunity to re...
The Istanbul Protocol (IP) is one of the great success stories of the global anti-torture movement, ...
Introduction: The Istanbul Protocol (IP) principles and guidelines have served as international...
The article reviews the historical precedents of the Forensic Assessment of Torture Survivors in the...
Health professionals and lawyers in Israel have used the Istanbul Protocol (IP), the internationally...
Background: The use of psychological torture or torture methods that leave no visible marks (stealth...
Using reports from 154 examinations of alleged torture victims among asylum applicants to Denmark co...
Since the emergence of human rights, torture has received considerable attention and is being prohib...
The article presents the recently launched Principles on Effective Interviewing for Investigations a...
Accumulated evidence that torture and other related human rights violation produce health-related co...
Introduction: In the 1978 Ireland v. the United Kingdom case, the European Court of Human Rights (EC...
Considers the European Court of Human Rights' treatment of the phenomenon of ‘disappearances’
Summary“Does torture prevention work?” is a very comprehensive book based on commendably profound re...
Background: The National Consortium of Torture Treatment Programs conducted a large voluntary resear...
Welcome to the Torture Journal Forensic Case Series, a new section of the Torture Journal. Through t...
We would like to thank the editors and the commentators for their comments and the opportunity to re...
The Istanbul Protocol (IP) is one of the great success stories of the global anti-torture movement, ...
Introduction: The Istanbul Protocol (IP) principles and guidelines have served as international...
The article reviews the historical precedents of the Forensic Assessment of Torture Survivors in the...
Health professionals and lawyers in Israel have used the Istanbul Protocol (IP), the internationally...
Background: The use of psychological torture or torture methods that leave no visible marks (stealth...
Using reports from 154 examinations of alleged torture victims among asylum applicants to Denmark co...
Since the emergence of human rights, torture has received considerable attention and is being prohib...
The article presents the recently launched Principles on Effective Interviewing for Investigations a...
Accumulated evidence that torture and other related human rights violation produce health-related co...
Introduction: In the 1978 Ireland v. the United Kingdom case, the European Court of Human Rights (EC...
Considers the European Court of Human Rights' treatment of the phenomenon of ‘disappearances’
Summary“Does torture prevention work?” is a very comprehensive book based on commendably profound re...
Background: The National Consortium of Torture Treatment Programs conducted a large voluntary resear...
Welcome to the Torture Journal Forensic Case Series, a new section of the Torture Journal. Through t...