Add to ORKGI was very interested in the discussion in the Editorial of the first 2017 issue of Torture Journal which referred to two similar literature reviews with opposite conclusions (Weiss et al., 2016; Patel, Williams, & Kellezi, 2016; Patel, Kellezi, & Williams, 2014) and would like to clarify and elaborate some of the differences, which I think are of relevance to the conclusions
There is growing interest in the possible role of systematic methods of reviewing literature in bioe...
Background: Torture survivors face multiple problems, including psychological difficulties, whether ...
Systematic or Unsystematic, is that the Question? Some reflections on the science, art, and politics...
<b>Objective:</b> To understand how systematic and narrative reviews differ in terms of research obj...
Literature reviews are central to any academic research. Whether journal article, conference present...
Education and related services are relying increasingly on empirically supported treatments (ESTs), ...
Narrative literature reviews serve a vital scientific function, but few resources help people learn ...
Narrative reviews offer a flexible way to report intervention results and comprise the majority of r...
We examine Graham's (1995) concerns about meta-analysis regarding (a) the use of poor-quality s...
Systematic reviews are becoming more popular as a way of doing research; however, not all systematic...
Literature reviews generally analyse and synthesis the evidence (or lack thereof) in a particular to...
Systematic reviews are generally placed above narrative reviews in an assumed hierarchy of secondary...
Background The recommendations of experts who write review articles are a critical determinant of th...
Background Systematic reviews are promoted as being important to inform decision-making. However, wh...
More often than not, a peer-reviewed journal article’s literature review is a boring to read as it i...
There is growing interest in the possible role of systematic methods of reviewing literature in bioe...
Background: Torture survivors face multiple problems, including psychological difficulties, whether ...
Systematic or Unsystematic, is that the Question? Some reflections on the science, art, and politics...
<b>Objective:</b> To understand how systematic and narrative reviews differ in terms of research obj...
Literature reviews are central to any academic research. Whether journal article, conference present...
Education and related services are relying increasingly on empirically supported treatments (ESTs), ...
Narrative literature reviews serve a vital scientific function, but few resources help people learn ...
Narrative reviews offer a flexible way to report intervention results and comprise the majority of r...
We examine Graham's (1995) concerns about meta-analysis regarding (a) the use of poor-quality s...
Systematic reviews are becoming more popular as a way of doing research; however, not all systematic...
Literature reviews generally analyse and synthesis the evidence (or lack thereof) in a particular to...
Systematic reviews are generally placed above narrative reviews in an assumed hierarchy of secondary...
Background The recommendations of experts who write review articles are a critical determinant of th...
Background Systematic reviews are promoted as being important to inform decision-making. However, wh...
More often than not, a peer-reviewed journal article’s literature review is a boring to read as it i...
There is growing interest in the possible role of systematic methods of reviewing literature in bioe...
Background: Torture survivors face multiple problems, including psychological difficulties, whether ...
Systematic or Unsystematic, is that the Question? Some reflections on the science, art, and politics...