It is a commonplace in Aristotelian scholarship that the forms of living beings and the animal species to which they give rise are “fixed.” However, Aristotle’s biological works often stress the flexibility of nature during the development of animals. The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to delineate the range of flexibility that Aristotle takes natures to have in the design of animals; and second, to draw out the implications of this for Aristotle’s embryology and theory of natural teleology
I argue that the human being fits squarely within the natural world in Aristotle’s anthropology. Lik...
Early discussion of the nature and generation of animals can be found in contexts that range from me...
The contents of this book cover observations and theories, science and philosophy in Aristotle\u27s ...
In comparison with the reductive theories of Aristotle's predecessors, Aristotle's ontology is very ...
We have reason to think that a fundamental goal of natural science, on Aristotle’s view, is to disco...
This note discusses the importance of Natural History (biology) in the development of Aristotle phil...
In this paper I address an important question in Aristotle’s biology, What are the causal mechanisms...
On the basis of two premises to which he is committed, it would seem that Aristotle must be a “natur...
[penultimate draft; prepared for publication in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals: A Critical Guide, ed....
Abstract: Due to the rapid development and ubiquitous impact of modern technology, many people feel ...
It has become somewhat of a platitude to call Aristotle the first epigenesist insofar as he thought ...
Most scholars of Aristotle’s biology have accepted the view of D. M. Balme and Pierre Pellegrin that...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the link in th...
I argue that the human being fits squarely within the natural world in Aristotle’s anthropology. Lik...
Early discussion of the nature and generation of animals can be found in contexts that range from me...
The contents of this book cover observations and theories, science and philosophy in Aristotle\u27s ...
In comparison with the reductive theories of Aristotle's predecessors, Aristotle's ontology is very ...
We have reason to think that a fundamental goal of natural science, on Aristotle’s view, is to disco...
This note discusses the importance of Natural History (biology) in the development of Aristotle phil...
In this paper I address an important question in Aristotle’s biology, What are the causal mechanisms...
On the basis of two premises to which he is committed, it would seem that Aristotle must be a “natur...
[penultimate draft; prepared for publication in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals: A Critical Guide, ed....
Abstract: Due to the rapid development and ubiquitous impact of modern technology, many people feel ...
It has become somewhat of a platitude to call Aristotle the first epigenesist insofar as he thought ...
Most scholars of Aristotle’s biology have accepted the view of D. M. Balme and Pierre Pellegrin that...
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the link in th...
I argue that the human being fits squarely within the natural world in Aristotle’s anthropology. Lik...
Early discussion of the nature and generation of animals can be found in contexts that range from me...
The contents of this book cover observations and theories, science and philosophy in Aristotle\u27s ...