Add to ORKGThis Note proposes that the arbitrary and capricious standard of review should be eliminated in favor of a de novo standard of review in all benefits denial cases
This Article develops a standard by which to judge the correctness of the ERISA federal common law r...
This Comment argues that a bright-line rule that does not require access to documents during the app...
ERISA, adopted a quarter century ago to reform private pension law, imposed by the end of the twenti...
The recent increase in litigation over the proper rule for judicial review of discretionary plan adm...
This Note critically analyzes the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal\u27s reasons for decreasing the leve...
When the administrator of a pension or employee benefit plan denies a participant\u27s claim for a b...
Since the Supreme Court\u27s Firestone decision, ERISA plan administrators have enjoyed broad discre...
While ERISA sets forth an explicit standard that the plan administrator’s actions must meet those of...
This Article will explore the current boundaries of the federal common law of ERISA and will urge th...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Firestone v. Bruch required that conflicts of interest by a plan ...
The Supreme Court held in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch that the review of administrators’ de...
This Note analyzes the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit\u27s standard of review ...
The comprehensive federal scheme for regulating pension and other employee benefit plans, ERISA, is ...
This Note examines whether courts should require section 510 claimants to exhaust either plan-based ...
Authoritative evidence has come to light that for a period of some years, stretching from the mid-19...
This Article develops a standard by which to judge the correctness of the ERISA federal common law r...
This Comment argues that a bright-line rule that does not require access to documents during the app...
ERISA, adopted a quarter century ago to reform private pension law, imposed by the end of the twenti...
The recent increase in litigation over the proper rule for judicial review of discretionary plan adm...
This Note critically analyzes the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal\u27s reasons for decreasing the leve...
When the administrator of a pension or employee benefit plan denies a participant\u27s claim for a b...
Since the Supreme Court\u27s Firestone decision, ERISA plan administrators have enjoyed broad discre...
While ERISA sets forth an explicit standard that the plan administrator’s actions must meet those of...
This Article will explore the current boundaries of the federal common law of ERISA and will urge th...
The Supreme Court\u27s decision in Firestone v. Bruch required that conflicts of interest by a plan ...
The Supreme Court held in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Bruch that the review of administrators’ de...
This Note analyzes the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit\u27s standard of review ...
The comprehensive federal scheme for regulating pension and other employee benefit plans, ERISA, is ...
This Note examines whether courts should require section 510 claimants to exhaust either plan-based ...
Authoritative evidence has come to light that for a period of some years, stretching from the mid-19...
This Article develops a standard by which to judge the correctness of the ERISA federal common law r...
This Comment argues that a bright-line rule that does not require access to documents during the app...
ERISA, adopted a quarter century ago to reform private pension law, imposed by the end of the twenti...