Add to ORKGThis Essay questions whether consistency in legal interpretation is truly a manifestation of the influence of law or instead a means to a preferred policy end
In the realm of American jurisprudence, little draws more excitement or controversy than investigati...
For close to a century, students of judicial behavior have suggested that what judges think is not a...
Everyone suspects that Supreme Court justices\u27 own views of policy play a part in their decisions...
This Article questions whether consistency in legal interpretation is truly a manifestation of the i...
Part I of this Article explores the theoretical problem that scholars use the term “judicial ideolog...
article published in law reviewThere is a peculiar point of agreement between prominent defenders of...
Much of the social science literature on judicial behavior has focused on the impact of ideology on ...
In their confirmation hearings, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Sotomayor both articulated a visio...
This essay argues that Intentionalism\u27s definition of interpretation entails nothing about the le...
Legal academics and political scientists continue to debate whether the legal, attitudinal, or strat...
In their confirmation hearings, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Sotomayor both articulated a visio...
This Article tests a model of judicial decisionmaking that incorporates elements of both the attitud...
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a “manifesto” exploring a methodological approach t...
What is it that a judge interprets in a statutory interpretation case? This Article shows that the a...
How should courts handle interpretive choices, such as when statutory text strongly points to one st...
In the realm of American jurisprudence, little draws more excitement or controversy than investigati...
For close to a century, students of judicial behavior have suggested that what judges think is not a...
Everyone suspects that Supreme Court justices\u27 own views of policy play a part in their decisions...
This Article questions whether consistency in legal interpretation is truly a manifestation of the i...
Part I of this Article explores the theoretical problem that scholars use the term “judicial ideolog...
article published in law reviewThere is a peculiar point of agreement between prominent defenders of...
Much of the social science literature on judicial behavior has focused on the impact of ideology on ...
In their confirmation hearings, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Sotomayor both articulated a visio...
This essay argues that Intentionalism\u27s definition of interpretation entails nothing about the le...
Legal academics and political scientists continue to debate whether the legal, attitudinal, or strat...
In their confirmation hearings, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Sotomayor both articulated a visio...
This Article tests a model of judicial decisionmaking that incorporates elements of both the attitud...
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a “manifesto” exploring a methodological approach t...
What is it that a judge interprets in a statutory interpretation case? This Article shows that the a...
How should courts handle interpretive choices, such as when statutory text strongly points to one st...
In the realm of American jurisprudence, little draws more excitement or controversy than investigati...
For close to a century, students of judicial behavior have suggested that what judges think is not a...
Everyone suspects that Supreme Court justices\u27 own views of policy play a part in their decisions...