On May 20, 1968, the Supreme Court ruled for the first time in Duncan v. Louisiana that in all cases involving serious crime the states must provide trial by jury. Prior to this decision, the Sixth Amendment guarantee was held to apply only to trials in federal courts. Two years later, on June 22, 1970, the high tribunal addressed itself in Baldwin v. New York and Williams v. Florida to some questions unanswered by the Duncan case: a “serious” crime, it announced, was one for which a penalty of over six months imprisonment could be imposed; and a six-member jury would pass constitutional muster. Still unanswered after Williams and Baldwin is the question of the constitutionality of less than unanimous verdicts and of juries composed of fewe...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that the use of a questionnaire was in...
The right to trial by jury in criminal cases is basic to the design of American criminal justice and...
The Founding Fathers thought the jury-trial right was so fundamental to our system of justice that t...
In the late 1960s, dockets in federal courts were becoming increasingly crowded, the backlog of crim...
A criminal jury of fewer than 6 members and a jury in which 5 out of 6 can find a verdict were held ...
After 700 years of common-law history and nearly 200 years of constitutional history, the Supreme Co...
Criminal defendants have frequently raised due process and equal protection objections to the exclus...
Recognizing the continually increasing burden placed on the jury in complex litigation cases, the au...
When defendant Leon Jones was arrested, he moved to be transferred to the district where the crimes ...
The Federal Bill of Rights and state constitutions rely heavily on procedural protections, especiall...
The criminal defendant’s right to a jury trial is enshrined within the U.S. Constitution as a protec...
Courts have struggled to define the scope and meaning of the seventh amendment over the past two cen...
Appellant, a male, was convicted in a Louisiana state court of aggravated kidnapping. Prior to his t...
In 1909 one Henry G. Connor, presumably Mr. Justice Connor of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, p...
At trial, defendants are afforded a panoply of rights right to counsel, to proof beyond a reasonable...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that the use of a questionnaire was in...
The right to trial by jury in criminal cases is basic to the design of American criminal justice and...
The Founding Fathers thought the jury-trial right was so fundamental to our system of justice that t...
In the late 1960s, dockets in federal courts were becoming increasingly crowded, the backlog of crim...
A criminal jury of fewer than 6 members and a jury in which 5 out of 6 can find a verdict were held ...
After 700 years of common-law history and nearly 200 years of constitutional history, the Supreme Co...
Criminal defendants have frequently raised due process and equal protection objections to the exclus...
Recognizing the continually increasing burden placed on the jury in complex litigation cases, the au...
When defendant Leon Jones was arrested, he moved to be transferred to the district where the crimes ...
The Federal Bill of Rights and state constitutions rely heavily on procedural protections, especiall...
The criminal defendant’s right to a jury trial is enshrined within the U.S. Constitution as a protec...
Courts have struggled to define the scope and meaning of the seventh amendment over the past two cen...
Appellant, a male, was convicted in a Louisiana state court of aggravated kidnapping. Prior to his t...
In 1909 one Henry G. Connor, presumably Mr. Justice Connor of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, p...
At trial, defendants are afforded a panoply of rights right to counsel, to proof beyond a reasonable...
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that the use of a questionnaire was in...
The right to trial by jury in criminal cases is basic to the design of American criminal justice and...
The Founding Fathers thought the jury-trial right was so fundamental to our system of justice that t...