This Article sketches some of the ideas and issues involved in the claims of the Law and Linguistics Consortium and others. It focuses mostly on these linguists\u27 claim of interpretive authority, but also on the particular theory of language that they offer. The question of their claim to objectivity also surfaces later in this essay. On all counts, a single inquiry sums it up: On whose terms have these linguists been authorized
One might expect that linguistics-the scientific study of language- would have much to offer the leg...
This Article discusses how corpus analysis, and similar empirically based methods of language study,...
Linda D. Jellum reviews Lawrence M. Solan, The Language of Statutes: Laws and Their Interpretation (...
First, I will discuss certain limits in the potential relevance of linguistic theory to legal analys...
Law and linguistics ought to be natural partners. Modem statutory and constitutional interpretation\...
Law and linguistics ought to be natural partners. Modem statutory and constitutional interpretation ...
What can lawyers learn from linguistics? Here are some thoughts, focused on statutory interpretation
I would like to take a closer look here at how linguists and lawyers look at language (sentences) an...
The question I pose for those who have devoted considerable effort to the project is why linguistics...
This Article begins by describing the development of interest within linguistics over the last two d...
In this Article, I want to take the heretical position that linguists\u27 principal expertise-ascert...
Language plays two roles in acquiring knowledge of foreign law. One is obvious - it provides access ...
Without fanfare, Plain Meaning and Hard Cases relegated its discussion of phonetics, phonology, and ...
Language shapes and reflects how we think about the world. It engages and intrigues us. Our everyday...
The principal theme of this essay is that statutory interpretation is a project that requires advoca...
One might expect that linguistics-the scientific study of language- would have much to offer the leg...
This Article discusses how corpus analysis, and similar empirically based methods of language study,...
Linda D. Jellum reviews Lawrence M. Solan, The Language of Statutes: Laws and Their Interpretation (...
First, I will discuss certain limits in the potential relevance of linguistic theory to legal analys...
Law and linguistics ought to be natural partners. Modem statutory and constitutional interpretation\...
Law and linguistics ought to be natural partners. Modem statutory and constitutional interpretation ...
What can lawyers learn from linguistics? Here are some thoughts, focused on statutory interpretation
I would like to take a closer look here at how linguists and lawyers look at language (sentences) an...
The question I pose for those who have devoted considerable effort to the project is why linguistics...
This Article begins by describing the development of interest within linguistics over the last two d...
In this Article, I want to take the heretical position that linguists\u27 principal expertise-ascert...
Language plays two roles in acquiring knowledge of foreign law. One is obvious - it provides access ...
Without fanfare, Plain Meaning and Hard Cases relegated its discussion of phonetics, phonology, and ...
Language shapes and reflects how we think about the world. It engages and intrigues us. Our everyday...
The principal theme of this essay is that statutory interpretation is a project that requires advoca...
One might expect that linguistics-the scientific study of language- would have much to offer the leg...
This Article discusses how corpus analysis, and similar empirically based methods of language study,...
Linda D. Jellum reviews Lawrence M. Solan, The Language of Statutes: Laws and Their Interpretation (...