Add to ORKGThe purpose of this Article is to argue that Congress, notwithstanding the significant problems illuminated by public choice theory and interest group analysis, should complete the work it started with the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996 by entirely preempting state control over capital formation. Only in this manner is it possible to reach the goal of a modern, fair, and efficient regulatory scheme for capital formation
In this Essay, Professor Romano considers the efficacy of competition among states for tax revenues ...
This article is reprinted with permission from the author. The Wreck of Regulation D: The Unintended...
The conventional wisdom has been that state law governs internal affairs, and federal law governs di...
As we move into the Twenty-First Century, state blue sky laws and regulations continue to govern a s...
There has long been complaints that the heavy regulatory hand of Blue Sky Law administrators prevent...
State securities laws—in particular, state laws requiring that securities offered by issuers be regi...
State blue sky laws—state laws that regulate a company’s offer and sale of securities—are a substant...
In our market economy, imposing rules on capital formation makes economic sense. Well-constructed r...
Regulating securities offerings entails balancing investor protection and capital formation. Inevita...
Section I of this comment examines the global opportunities available to startups in the digital eco...
A number of articles and treatises give a detailed recitation of the history of blue sky laws, the r...
While most regulators at both the state and federal levels espouse an attitude and philosophy of coo...
Laws regarding the sale of securities may be understood as responses to perceived bargaining failure...
Regulation D is—or at least should be—the crown jewel of the Securities and Exchange Commission\u27s...
The thesis of this Article is simple: the Securities Act of 1933 does not work very well for small i...
In this Essay, Professor Romano considers the efficacy of competition among states for tax revenues ...
This article is reprinted with permission from the author. The Wreck of Regulation D: The Unintended...
The conventional wisdom has been that state law governs internal affairs, and federal law governs di...
As we move into the Twenty-First Century, state blue sky laws and regulations continue to govern a s...
There has long been complaints that the heavy regulatory hand of Blue Sky Law administrators prevent...
State securities laws—in particular, state laws requiring that securities offered by issuers be regi...
State blue sky laws—state laws that regulate a company’s offer and sale of securities—are a substant...
In our market economy, imposing rules on capital formation makes economic sense. Well-constructed r...
Regulating securities offerings entails balancing investor protection and capital formation. Inevita...
Section I of this comment examines the global opportunities available to startups in the digital eco...
A number of articles and treatises give a detailed recitation of the history of blue sky laws, the r...
While most regulators at both the state and federal levels espouse an attitude and philosophy of coo...
Laws regarding the sale of securities may be understood as responses to perceived bargaining failure...
Regulation D is—or at least should be—the crown jewel of the Securities and Exchange Commission\u27s...
The thesis of this Article is simple: the Securities Act of 1933 does not work very well for small i...
In this Essay, Professor Romano considers the efficacy of competition among states for tax revenues ...
This article is reprinted with permission from the author. The Wreck of Regulation D: The Unintended...
The conventional wisdom has been that state law governs internal affairs, and federal law governs di...